» Articles » PMID: 15581524

Adolescent Pregnancy Intentions and Pregnancy Outcomes: a Longitudinal Examination

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2004 Dec 8
PMID 15581524
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: (a) To examine different methods of assessing pregnancy intention; (b) to identify psychosocial differences between those who indicate pregnancy intentions and those who do not; and (c) to examine the relationship between pregnancy intentions and subsequent pregnancy at 6-month follow-up in nonpregnant (at baseline), sexually experienced adolescent females.

Methods: Longitudinal cohort study of 354 sexually experienced female adolescents attending either a STD clinic or HMO adolescent medicine clinic in northern California. Student's t-tests and regressions examined psychosocial differences between females who reported "any" and "no" pregnancy intentions. ANOVAs examined differences among different combinations of pregnancy plans/likelihood. Chi-square analyses assessed associations between baseline pregnancy intentions and subsequent pregnancy.

Results: Adolescents' reports of their pregnancy plans and their assessments of pregnancy likelihood differed from one another (chi2 = 50.39, df = 1, p < .001). Pregnancy attitudes and baseline contraceptive use differentiated those with inconsistent pregnancy intentions (Not Planning, but Likely) from those with clear pregnancy intentions (Planning and Likely, and Not Planning and Not Likely) (Pregnancy Attitudes: F [2,338] = 68.96, p < .0001; Contraceptive Use: F [2,308] = 14.87, p < .0001). Suspected pregnancies and positive pregnancy test results were associated with baseline pregnancy intentions (Suspected: chi2 = 19.08, df = 2, p < .01; Positive Results: chi2 = 8.84, df = 2, p = .015).

Conclusions: To reduce adolescent childbearing we must assess pregnancy intentions in multiple ways. Information/education might benefit those female adolescents with inconsistent reports of pregnancy intentions.

Citing Articles

Young women's joint relationship, sex, and contraceptive trajectories: Evidence from the United States.

Brew B, Weitzman A, Musick K, Kusunoki Y Demogr Res. 2024; 42:933-984.

PMID: 38249422 PMC: 10798792. DOI: 10.4054/demres.2020.42.34.


Association of pregnancy attitudes and intentions with sexual activity and psychiatric symptoms in justice-involved youth.

Rosen B, Dauria E, Shumway M, Smith J, Koinis-Mitchell D, Tolou-Shams M Child Youth Serv Rev. 2023; 138.

PMID: 38107676 PMC: 10723635. DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106510.


CHOICES for sickle cell reproductive health: A protocol of a randomized preconception intervention model for a single gene disorder.

Wilkie D, Telisnor G, Powell-Roach K, Rangel A, Greenlee A, Ezenwa M PLoS One. 2023; 18(12):e0294907.

PMID: 38060589 PMC: 10703323. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294907.


Shedding light on attitudes towards pregnancy among Inuit adolescents from Nunavik.

Moisan C, Belanger R, Fraser S, Muckle G Int J Circumpolar Health. 2022; 81(1):2051335.

PMID: 35319351 PMC: 8956303. DOI: 10.1080/22423982.2022.2051335.


Teen Perceptions of Sexual Activity: Influences, consequences, realities, and thoughts on safe sexual health practices.

Herrman J Dela J Public Health. 2021; 3(1):66-76.

PMID: 34466900 PMC: 8352461. DOI: 10.32481/djph.2017.03.010.


References
1.
Kalmuss D, Namerow P . Subsequent childbearing among teenage mothers: the determinants of a closely spaced second birth. Fam Plann Perspect. 1994; 26(4):149-53, 159. View

2.
Kost K, Forrest J . Intention status of U.S. births in 1988: differences by mothers' socioeconomic and demographic characteristics. Fam Plann Perspect. 1995; 27(1):11-7. View

3.
Rosenfeld J, Everett K . Factors related to planned and unplanned pregnancies. J Fam Pract. 1996; 43(2):161-6. View

4.
Kaufmann R, Morris L, Spitz A . Comparison of two question sequences for assessing pregnancy intentions. Am J Epidemiol. 1997; 145(9):810-6. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009174. View

5.
Henshaw S . Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998; 30(1):24-9, 46. View