» Articles » PMID: 23471309

Global Consensus Theorem and Self-organized Criticality: Unifying Principles for Understanding Self-organization, Swarm Intelligence and Mechanisms of Carcinogenesis

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2013 Mar 9
PMID 23471309
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Complex biological systems manifest a large variety of emergent phenomena among which prominent roles belong to self-organization and swarm intelligence. Generally, each level in a biological hierarchy possesses its own systemic properties and requires its own way of observation, conceptualization, and modeling. In this work, an attempt is made to outline general guiding principles in exploration of a wide range of seemingly dissimilar phenomena observed in large communities of individuals devoid of any personal intelligence and interacting with each other through simple stimulus-response rules. Mathematically, these guiding principles are well captured by the Global Consensus Theorem (GCT) equally applicable to neural networks and to Lotka-Volterra population dynamics. Universality of the mechanistic principles outlined by GCT allows for a unified approach to such diverse systems as biological networks, communities of social insects, robotic communities, microbial communities, communities of somatic cells, social networks and many other systems. Another cluster of universal laws governing the self-organization in large communities of locally interacting individuals is built around the principle of self-organized criticality (SOC). The GCT and SOC, separately or in combination, provide a conceptual basis for understanding the phenomena of self-organization occurring in large communities without involvement of a supervisory authority, without system-wide informational infrastructure, and without mapping of general plan of action onto cognitive/behavioral faculties of its individual members. Cancer onset and proliferation serves as an important example of application of these conceptual approaches. In this paper, the point of view is put forward that apparently irreconcilable contradictions between two opposing theories of carcinogenesis, that is, the Somatic Mutation Theory and the Tissue Organization Field Theory, may be resolved using the systemic approaches provided by GST and SOC.

Citing Articles

Mutation or not, what directly establishes a neoplastic state, namely cellular immortality and autonomy, still remains unknown and should be prioritized in our research.

Zhu S, Wang J, Zellmer L, Xu N, Liu M, Hu Y J Cancer. 2022; 13(9):2810-2843.

PMID: 35912015 PMC: 9330459. DOI: 10.7150/jca.72628.


Quantifying emergence and self-organisation of Enterobacter cloacae microbial communities.

Balaban V, Lim S, Gupta G, Boedicker J, Bogdan P Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):12416.

PMID: 30120343 PMC: 6098138. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-30654-9.


Self-organizing Complex Networks: individual versus global rules.

Mahmoodi K, West B, Grigolini P Front Physiol. 2017; 8:478.

PMID: 28736534 PMC: 5500654. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00478.


From Neural and Social Cooperation to the Global Emergence of Cognition.

Grigolini P, Piccinini N, Svenkeson A, Pramukkul P, Lambert D, West B Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2015; 3:78.

PMID: 26137455 PMC: 4468630. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2015.00078.


The intelligence paradox; will ET get the metabolic syndrome? Lessons from and for Earth.

Nunn A, Guy G, Bell J Nutr Metab (Lond). 2014; 11:34.

PMID: 25089149 PMC: 4118160. DOI: 10.1186/1743-7075-11-34.

References
1.
Kashiwagi A, Urabe I, Kaneko K, Yomo T . Adaptive response of a gene network to environmental changes by fitness-induced attractor selection. PLoS One. 2006; 1:e49. PMC: 1762378. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000049. View

2.
May R . Will a large complex system be stable?. Nature. 1972; 238(5364):413-4. DOI: 10.1038/238413a0. View

3.
Rosenfeld S . Stochastic oscillations in genetic regulatory networks: application to microarray experiments. EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol. 2008; :59526. PMC: 3171319. DOI: 10.1155/BSB/2006/59526. View

4.
Amdam G, Seehuus S . Order, disorder, death: lessons from a superorganism. Adv Cancer Res. 2006; 95:31-60. PMC: 2386248. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-230X(06)95002-7. View

5.
Hickson J, Yamada S, Berger J, Alverdy J, OKeefe J, Bassler B . Societal interactions in ovarian cancer metastasis: a quorum-sensing hypothesis. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2008; 26(1):67-76. DOI: 10.1007/s10585-008-9177-z. View