» Articles » PMID: 23463644

Patterned Three-dimensional Encapsulation of Embryonic Stem Cells Using Dielectrophoresis and Stereolithography

Overview
Date 2013 Mar 7
PMID 23463644
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Controlling the assembly of cells in three dimensions is very important for engineering functional tissues, drug screening, probing cell-cell/cell-matrix interactions, and studying the emergent behavior of cellular systems. Although the current methods of cell encapsulation in hydrogels can distribute them in three dimensions, these methods typically lack spatial control of multi-cellular organization and do not allow for the possibility of cell-cell contacts as seen for the native tissue. Here, we report the integration of dielectrophoresis (DEP) with stereolithography (SL) apparatus for the spatial patterning of cells on custom made gold micro-electrodes. Afterwards, they are encapsulated in poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) hydrogels of different stiffnesses. This technique can mimic the in vivo microscale tissue architecture, where the cells have a high degree of three dimensional (3D) spatial control. As a proof of concept, we show the patterning and encapsulation of mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) and C2C12 skeletal muscle myoblasts. mESCs show high viability in both the DEP (91.79% ± 1.4%) and the no DEP (94.27% ± 0.5%) hydrogel samples. Furthermore, we also show the patterning of mouse embryoid bodies (mEBs) and C2C12 spheroids in the hydrogels, and verify their viability. This robust and flexible in vitro platform can enable various applications in stem cell differentiation and tissue engineering by mimicking elements of the native 3D in vivo cellular micro-environment.

Citing Articles

It's Electric: When Technology Gives a Boost to Stem Cell Science.

Lee A, Aghaamoo M, Adams T, Flanagan L Curr Stem Cell Rep. 2022; 4(2):116-126.

PMID: 36311261 PMC: 9616103. DOI: 10.1007/s40778-018-0124-x.


Dielectrophoresis: Developments and applications from 2010 to 2020.

Sarno B, Heineck D, Heller M, Ibsen S Electrophoresis. 2020; 42(5):539-564.

PMID: 33191521 PMC: 7986072. DOI: 10.1002/elps.202000156.


Printability and Shape Fidelity of Bioinks in 3D Bioprinting.

Schwab A, Levato R, DEste M, Piluso S, Eglin D, Malda J Chem Rev. 2020; 120(19):11028-11055.

PMID: 32856892 PMC: 7564085. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00084.


3D Bioprinting Stem Cell Derived Tissues.

Tasnim N, De La Vega L, Kumar S, Abelseth L, Alonzo M, Amereh M Cell Mol Bioeng. 2019; 11(4):219-240.

PMID: 31719887 PMC: 6816617. DOI: 10.1007/s12195-018-0530-2.


3D Bioprinting: from Benches to Translational Applications.

Heinrich M, Liu W, Jimenez A, Yang J, Akpek A, Liu X Small. 2019; 15(23):e1805510.

PMID: 31033203 PMC: 6752725. DOI: 10.1002/smll.201805510.