» Articles » PMID: 23442543

Carbohydrate-binding Modules (CBMs) Revisited: Reduced Amount of Water Counterbalances the Need for CBMs

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2013 Feb 28
PMID 23442543
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A vast number of organisms are known to produce structurally diversified cellulases capable of degrading cellulose, the most abundant biopolymer on earth. The generally accepted paradigm is that the carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs) of cellulases are required for efficient saccharification of insoluble substrates. Based on sequence data, surprisingly more than 60% of the cellulases identified lack carbohydrate-binding modules or alternative protein structures linked to cellulases (dockerins). This finding poses the question about the role of the CBMs: why would most cellulases lack CBMs, if they are necessary for the efficient hydrolysis of cellulose?

Results: The advantage of CBMs, which increase the affinity of cellulases to substrates, was found to be diminished by reducing the amount of water in the hydrolytic system, which increases the probability of enzyme-substrate interaction. At low substrate concentration (1% w/w), CBMs were found to be more important in the catalytic performance of the cellobiohydrolases TrCel7A and TrCel6A of Trichoderma reesei as compared to that of the endoglucanases TrCel5A and TrCel7B. Increasing the substrate concentration while maintaining the enzyme-to-substrate ratio enhanced adsorption of TrCel7A, independent of the presence of the CBM. At 20% (w/w) substrate concentration, the hydrolytic performance of cellulases without CBMs caught up with that of cellulases with CBMs. This phenomenon was more noticeable on the lignin-containing pretreated wheat straw as compared to the cellulosic Avicel, presumably due to unproductive adsorption of enzymes to lignin.

Conclusions: Here we propose that the water content in the natural environments of carbohydrate-degrading organisms might have led to the evolution of various substrate-binding structures. In addition, some well recognized problems of economical saccharification such as unproductive binding of cellulases, which reduces the hydrolysis rate and prevents recycling of enzymes, could be partially overcome by omitting CBMs. This finding could help solve bottlenecks of enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocelluloses and speed up commercialization of second generation bioethanol.

Citing Articles

A modular enzyme with combined hemicellulose-removing and LPMO activity increases cellulose accessibility in softwood.

Forsberg Z, Tuveng T, Eijsink V FEBS J. 2024; 292(1):75-93.

PMID: 39190632 PMC: 11705215. DOI: 10.1111/febs.17250.


The impact of the carbohydrate-binding module on how a lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase modifies cellulose fibers.

Stopamo F, Sulaeva I, Budischowsky D, Rahikainen J, Marjamaa K, Kruus K Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod. 2024; 17(1):118.

PMID: 39182111 PMC: 11344300. DOI: 10.1186/s13068-024-02564-8.


Beyond the Surface: A Methodological Exploration of Enzyme Impact along the Cellulose Fiber Cross-Section.

Sulaeva I, Sto Pamo F, Melikhov I, Budischowsky D, Rahikainen J, Borisova A Biomacromolecules. 2024; 25(5):3076-3086.

PMID: 38634234 PMC: 11094719. DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.4c00152.


Carbohydrate-binding modules enhance HO tolerance by promoting lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase active site HO consumption.

Gao W, Li T, Zhou H, Ju J, Yin H J Biol Chem. 2023; 300(1):105573.

PMID: 38122901 PMC: 10825053. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105573.


A High-Quality Genome Sequence of the 5-18 Strain Isolated from a Poplar Plantation Provides Insights into Its Lignocellulose Degradation.

Hu S, Zhu R, Yu X, Wang B, Ruan H, Jin F Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(16).

PMID: 37628925 PMC: 10454814. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241612745.


References
1.
Nidetzky B, Steiner W, Hayn M, Claeyssens M . Cellulose hydrolysis by the cellulases from Trichoderma reesei: a new model for synergistic interaction. Biochem J. 1994; 298 Pt 3:705-10. PMC: 1137917. DOI: 10.1042/bj2980705. View

2.
Henrissat B, Bairoch A . Updating the sequence-based classification of glycosyl hydrolases. Biochem J. 1996; 316 ( Pt 2):695-6. PMC: 1217404. DOI: 10.1042/bj3160695. View

3.
Jorgensen H, Vibe-Pedersen J, Larsen J, Felby C . Liquefaction of lignocellulose at high-solids concentrations. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2006; 96(5):862-70. DOI: 10.1002/bit.21115. View

4.
Stahlberg J, Johansson G, Pettersson G . A binding-site-deficient, catalytically active, core protein of endoglucanase III from the culture filtrate of Trichoderma reesei. Eur J Biochem. 1988; 173(1):179-83. DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1988.tb13982.x. View

5.
Reinikainen T, Ruohonen L, Nevanen T, Laaksonen L, Kraulis P, Jones T . Investigation of the function of mutated cellulose-binding domains of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I. Proteins. 1992; 14(4):475-82. DOI: 10.1002/prot.340140408. View