» Articles » PMID: 23438512

Phosphotyrosine Profiling of NSCLC Cells in Response to EGF and HGF Reveals Network Specific Mediators of Invasion

Overview
Journal J Proteome Res
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2013 Feb 27
PMID 23438512
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Growth factor signaling is deregulated in cancer and often leads to invasion, yet receptor tyrosine kinase signaling pathways driving invasion under different growth factor conditions are not well understood. To identify specific signaling molecules regulating invasion of A549 non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) cells downstream of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Met, quantitative site-specific mass spectrometric analysis of tyrosine phosphorylation was performed following epidermal growth factor (EGF) or hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) stimulation, at three different growth factor concentrations and at two time points. Through this analysis, the temporal and concentration dependent phosphorylation profiles were obtained for 131 and 139 sites downstream of EGF and HGF stimulation, respectively. To characterize the effect of these signaling network alterations, we quantified 3D cell migration/invasion through Matrigel. Partial least-squares regression (PLSR) analysis was performed to identify the tyrosine phosphorylation sites most strongly correlated with EGF and/or HGF mediated invasion. Potential common and specific signaling events required for driving invasion downstream of EGFR and Met were identified using either a combined or two independent PLSR models, based on the quantitative EGF or HGF data. Our data highlight the integration and compartmentalization of signaling required for invasion in cancer.

Citing Articles

Phosphorylation of tyrosine 90 in SH3 domain is a new regulatory switch controlling Src kinase.

Koudelkova L, Pelantova M, Bruhova Z, Sztacho M, Pavlik V, Panek D Elife. 2023; 12.

PMID: 37428018 PMC: 10361714. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.82428.


Predictive data-driven modeling of C-terminal tyrosine function in the EGFR signaling network.

Gerritsen J, Faraguna J, Bonavia R, Furnari F, White F Life Sci Alliance. 2023; 6(8).

PMID: 37169593 PMC: 10176108. DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202201466.


A Fresh Look at the Structure, Regulation, and Functions of Fodrin.

Sreeja J, John R, Dharmapal D, Nellikka R, Sengupta S Mol Cell Biol. 2020; 40(17).

PMID: 32601107 PMC: 7431051. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00133-20.


Phosphorylation Sites in Protein Kinases and Phosphatases Regulated by Formyl Peptide Receptor 2 Signaling.

Annunziata M, Parisi M, Esposito G, Fabbrocini G, Ammendola R, Cattaneo F Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(11).

PMID: 32471307 PMC: 7312799. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21113818.


Role of cytokines in combinatorial immunotherapeutics of non-small cell lung cancer through systems perspective.

Misra P, Singh S Cancer Med. 2019; 8(5):1976-1995.

PMID: 30997737 PMC: 6536974. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2112.


References
1.
Sporn M, Roberts A . Autocrine growth factors and cancer. Nature. 1985; 313(6005):745-7. DOI: 10.1038/313745a0. View

2.
Huang P, Mukasa A, Bonavia R, Flynn R, Brewer Z, Cavenee W . Quantitative analysis of EGFRvIII cellular signaling networks reveals a combinatorial therapeutic strategy for glioblastoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(31):12867-72. PMC: 1937558. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0705158104. View

3.
Hiramoto-Yamaki N, Takeuchi S, Ueda S, Harada K, Fujimoto S, Negishi M . Ephexin4 and EphA2 mediate cell migration through a RhoG-dependent mechanism. J Cell Biol. 2010; 190(3):461-77. PMC: 2922637. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201005141. View

4.
Bottaro D, Rubin J, Faletto D, Chan A, Kmiecik T, Woude G . Identification of the hepatocyte growth factor receptor as the c-met proto-oncogene product. Science. 1991; 251(4995):802-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.1846706. View

5.
Normanno N, De Luca A, Bianco C, Strizzi L, Mancino M, Maiello M . Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling in cancer. Gene. 2005; 366(1):2-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2005.10.018. View