» Articles » PMID: 23425735

The Impact of Specialist Trauma Service on Major Trauma Mortality

Overview
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2013 Feb 22
PMID 23425735
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Trauma services throughout the world have had positive effects on trauma-related mortality. Australian trauma services are generally more consultative in nature rather than the North American model of full trauma admission service. We hypothesized that the introduction of a consultative specialist trauma service in a Level I Australian trauma center would reduce mortality of the severely injured.

Methods: A 10-year retrospective study (January 1, 2002-December 31, 2011) was performed on all trauma patients admitted with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15. Patients were identified from the trauma registry, and data for age, sex, mechanism of injury, ISS, survival to discharge, and length of stay were collected. Mortality was examined for patients with severe injury (ISS > 15) and patients with critical injury (ISS > 24) and compared for the three periods: 2002-2004 (without trauma specialist), 2005-2007 (with trauma specialist), and 2008-2011 (with specialist trauma service).

Results: A total of 3,869 severely injured (ISS > 15) trauma patients were identified during the 10-year period. Of these, 2,826 (73%) were male, 1,513 (39%) were critically injured (ISS > 24), and more than 97% (3,754) were the victim of blunt trauma. Overall mortality decreased from 12.4% to 9.3% (relative risk, 0.75) from period one to period three and from 25.4% to 20.3% (relative risk, 0.80) for patients with critical injury. A 0.46% per year decrease (p = 0.018) in mortality was detected (odds ratio, 0.63; p < 0.001). For critically injured (ISS > 24), the trend was (0.61% per year; odds ratio, 0.68; p = 0.039).

Conclusion: The introduction of a specialist trauma service decreased the mortality of patients with severe injury, the model of care should be considered to implement state- and nationwide in Australia.

Level Of Evidence: Epidemiologic study, level III.

Citing Articles

A Systematic Literature Review of Trauma Systems: An Operations Management Perspective.

Wang Z, Rostami-Tabar B, Haider J, Naim M, Haider J Adv Rehabil Sci Pract. 2025; 14():27536351241310645.

PMID: 39830526 PMC: 11742173. DOI: 10.1177/27536351241310645.


Equitable access to quality injury care; Equi-Injury project protocol for prioritizing interventions in four low- or middle-income countries: a mixed method study.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):429.

PMID: 38576004 PMC: 10996087. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10668-y.


The outcomes of the most severe polytrauma patients: a systematic review of the use of high ISS cutoffs for performance measurement.

Hardy B, Varghese A, Adams M, Enninghorst N, Balogh Z Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023; 50(4):1305-1312.

PMID: 38108840 PMC: 11481685. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-023-02409-3.


The overview of the Australian trauma system.

Warren K, Morrey C, Oppy A, Pirpiris M, Balogh Z OTA Int. 2023; 2(Suppl 1):e018.

PMID: 37675256 PMC: 10479347. DOI: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000018.


Evaluating the definition of severely injured patients: a Japanese nationwide 5-year retrospective study.

Toida C, Muguruma T, Gakumazawa M, Shinohara M, Abe T, Takeuchi I BMJ Open. 2023; 13(2):e062619.

PMID: 36822812 PMC: 9950884. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062619.