A Systematic Literature Review of Trauma Systems: An Operations Management Perspective

Overview

Journal Adv Rehabil Sci Pract

Publisher Sage Publications

Date 2025 Jan 20

PMID 39830526

Authors

Zihao Wang

Bahman Rostami-Tabar

Jane Haider

Mohamed Naim

Javvad Haider

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Trauma systems provide comprehensive care across various settings, from prehospital services to rehabilitation, integrating clinical and social care aspects. Established in the 1970s, these systems are pivotal yet under-researched in their operational management. This study aims to fill this gap by focussing on the integration of operations management (OM) techniques to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of trauma systems. By leveraging proven OM strategies from other healthcare sectors, we seek to improve patient outcomes and optimise system performance, addressing a crucial need for innovation in trauma care operations.

Methodology: A systematic literature review was conducted using the PICOTS framework to explore operational aspects of trauma systems across varied settings, from emergency departments to specialised centres. Searches were performed in 5 databases, focussing on articles published from 2006 to 2024. Keywords related to operational research and management targeted both trauma systems and emergency management services. Our method involved identifying, synthesising, and summarising studies to evaluate operational performance, with a specific emphasis on articles that applied operational research/management techniques in trauma care. All eligible articles were critically appraised using 2 quality assessment tools.

Results: Employing Donabedian's framework to analyse the quality of trauma systems through structure, process, and outcome dimensions, our systematic review included 160 studies. Of these, 5 studies discussed the application of the Donabedian evaluation framework to trauma systems, and 14 studies examined structural elements, focussing on the location of healthcare facilities, trauma resource management, and EMS logistics. The 63 studies on process indicators primarily assessed triage procedures, with some exploring the timeliness of trauma care. Meanwhile, the 78 outcome-oriented studies predominantly evaluated mortality rates, alongside a smaller number assessing functional outcomes.

Conclusion: Existing evaluation metrics primarily focussed on triage accuracy and mortality are inadequate. We propose expanding these metrics to include patient length of stay (LOS) and rehabilitation trajectory analyses. There is a critical gap in understanding patient flow management and long-term outcomes, necessitating focussed research on LOS modelling and improved rehabilitation data collection. Addressing these areas is essential for optimising trauma care and improving patient recovery outcomes.

References

Moore L, Stelfox H, Turgeon A, Nathens A, Bourgeois G, Lapointe J . Hospital length of stay after admission for traumatic injury in Canada: a multicenter cohort study. Ann Surg. 2014; 260(1):179-87. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000624. View

Havermans R, de Jongh M, Bemelman M, van Driel A, Noordergraaf G, Lansink K . Trauma care before and after optimisation in a level I trauma Centre: Life-saving changes. Injury. 2019; 50(10):1678-1683. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.07.017. View

Scerbo M, Radhakrishnan H, Cotton B, Dua A, Del Junco D, Wade C . Prehospital triage of trauma patients using the Random Forest computer algorithm. J Surg Res. 2014; 187(2):371-6. PMC: 4336161. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.06.037. View

Voskens F, van Rein E, van der Sluijs R, Houwert R, Lichtveld R, Verleisdonk E . Accuracy of Prehospital Triage in Selecting Severely Injured Trauma Patients. JAMA Surg. 2017; 153(4):322-327. PMC: 5933379. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.4472. View

Balvers K, Van der Horst M, Graumans M, Boer C, Binnekade J, Goslings J . Hypothermia as a predictor for mortality in trauma patients at admittance to the Intensive Care Unit. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2016; 9(3):97-102. PMC: 4960783. DOI: 10.4103/0974-2700.185276. View

Byrne J, Mann N, Hoeft C, Buick J, Karanicolas P, Rizoli S . The impact of short prehospital times on trauma center performance benchmarking: An ecologic study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016; 80(4):586-94. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000974. View

Crowley B, Griffin R, Smedley W, Moore D, McCarthy S, Hendershot K . Secondary Overtriage of Trauma Patients: Analysis of Clinical and Geographic Patterns. J Surg Res. 2020; 254:286-293. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.04.009. View

Kieffer W, Michalik D, Gallagher K, McFadyen I, Bernard J, Rogers B . Temporal variation in major trauma admissions. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016; 98(2):128-37. PMC: 5210482. DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0040. View

Truchon C, Moore L, Belcaid A, Clement J, Trudelle N, Ulysse M . SHAPING QUALITY THROUGH VISION, STRUCTURE, AND MONITORING OF PERFORMANCE AND QUALITY INDICATORS: IMPACT STORY FROM THE QUEBEC TRAUMA NETWORK. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017; 33(4):415-419. DOI: 10.1017/S0266462317000198. View

10.

Holena D, Kaufman E, Hatchimonji J, Smith B, Xiong R, Wasser T . The impact of interhospital transfer on mortality benchmarking at Level III and IV trauma centers: A step toward shared mortality attribution in a statewide system. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019; 88(1):42-50. PMC: 6923584. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002491. View

11.

Boyd J, Moore L, Atenafu E, Hamid J, Nathens A, Stelfox H . A retrospective cohort study of the relationship between quality indicator measurement and patient outcomes in adult trauma centers in the United States. Injury. 2016; 48(1):13-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.10.040. View

12.

Dennis B, Stonko D, Callcut R, Sidwell R, Stassen N, Cohen M . Artificial neural networks can predict trauma volume and acuity regardless of center size and geography: A multicenter study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019; 87(1):181-187. PMC: 6602836. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002320. View

13.

Kettlewell J, Timmons S, Bridger K, Kendrick D, Kellezi B, Holmes J . A study of mapping usual care and unmet need for vocational rehabilitation and psychological support following major trauma in five health districts in the UK. Clin Rehabil. 2020; 35(5):750-764. PMC: 8076839. DOI: 10.1177/0269215520971777. View

14.

Durston A, Chapman J, Marshall D, Mason L . Patterns of major trauma admissions to a level 1 trauma centre: A five year database analysis. Injury. 2023; 55(2):111237. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111237. View

15.

Calland J, Stukenborg G . Trauma centre patient volume and inpatient mortality risk reconsidered. Injury. 2015; 47(5):1072-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.11.017. View

16.

Metcalfe D, Perry D, Bouamra O, Salim A, Woodford M, Edwards A . Regionalisation of trauma care in England. Bone Joint J. 2016; 98-B(9):1253-61. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B9.37525. View

17.

Lam S, Lingsma H, van Beeck E, Leenen L . Validation of a base deficit-based trauma prediction model and comparison with TRISS and ASCOT. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015; 42(5):627-633. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-015-0592-y. View

18.

Barringer M, Thomason M, Kilgo P, Spallone L . Improving outcomes in a regional trauma system: impact of a level III trauma center. Am J Surg. 2006; 192(5):685-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.11.006. View

19.

Alharbi R, Shrestha S, Lewis V, Miller C . The effectiveness of trauma care systems at different stages of development in reducing mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Emerg Surg. 2021; 16(1):38. PMC: 8278750. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-021-00381-0. View

20.

Henriksson M, Saulnier D, Berg J, Warnberg M . The transfer of clinical prediction models for early trauma care had uncertain effects on mistriage. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020; 128:66-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.08.014. View