» Articles » PMID: 23415972

Outcome of Cryotransfer of Embryos Developed from Vitrified Oocytes: Double Vitrification Has No Impact on Delivery Rates

Overview
Journal Fertil Steril
Date 2013 Feb 19
PMID 23415972
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Evaluate the outcome of cryotransfer of embryos developed from vitrified oocytes.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Private university-affiliated IVF center.

Patient(s): Women undergoing warming cycles in which vitrified embryos were developed from vitrified or fresh oocytes.

Intervention(s): Vitrification by the Cryotop open device.

Main Outcome Measure(s): Delivery rate (DR) per warming cycle.

Result(s): A total of 471 warming cycles of 796 vitrified embryos developed from vitrified oocytes (group 1) and 2,629 warming cycles of 4,394 vitrified embryos derived from fresh oocytes (group 2) were evaluated. Overall survival rates were 97.2% [95% confidence interval [CI] 95.9%-98.6%] vs. 95.7% [95% CI 94.9-96.4], respectively. DRs per warming cycle were 33.8% (group 1) and 30.9% (group 2). Double vitrification had no effect on DR (odds ratio [OR] 0.877, 95% CI 0.712-1.080). Confounding factors (ovum donation or autologous cycles; day-3 or blastocyst embryo transfer [ET]; natural or hormonal replacement therapy for ET; single or double ET; previous cycles, number of oocytes, doses of gonadotropins and E2 levels on the day of hCG) did not modify the effect of double vitrification on DR (OR 0.872, 95% CI 0.702-1.084).

Conclusion(s): Vitrification at early cleavage or blastocyst stage of embryos obtained from previously vitrified oocytes has no effect on DR/warming cycle.

Citing Articles

Does double cryopreservation as well as double biopsy affect embryo viability and clinical outcomes? Evidence from a systematic review of the literature.

Bartolacci A, Vitiello C, de Girolamo S, Papaleo E, Pagliardini L J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025; .

PMID: 39893354 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-025-03398-5.


Comparison of fresh testicular sperm aspiration and use of either thawed pre-frozen sperm or oocyte freezing: impact on cumulative live birth rates for couples experiencing ejaculation failure.

Zhan S, An G, Gan J, Du H, Fu X, Wang C Hum Reprod. 2024; 40(2):199-209.

PMID: 39740242 PMC: 11788192. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deae290.


Vitrification of human blastocysts for couples undergoing assisted reproduction: an updated review.

Sciorio R, Tramontano L, Campos G, Greco P, Mondrone G, Surbone A Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024; 12:1398049.

PMID: 38827525 PMC: 11140474. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1398049.


Should embryo rebiopsy be considered a regular strategy to increase the number of embryos available for transfer?.

Nohales M, Coello A, Martin A, Insua F, Meseguer M, de Los Santos M J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023; 40(8):1905-1913.

PMID: 37432589 PMC: 10371936. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-02875-z.


Switching to testicular sperm after a previous ICSI failure with ejaculated sperm significantly improves blastocyst quality without increasing aneuploidy risk.

Hervas I, Gil Julia M, Rivera-Egea R, Navarro-Gomezlechon A, Mossetti L, Garrido N J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022; 39(10):2275-2285.

PMID: 35972585 PMC: 9596654. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02595-w.