» Articles » PMID: 23403430

Monte Carlo Simulations Based on Phase 1 Studies Predict Target Attainment of Ceftobiprole in Nosocomial Pneumonia Patients: a Validation Study

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2013 Feb 14
PMID 23403430
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) of antimicrobial dosage regimens during drug development to derive predicted target attainment values is frequently used to choose the optimal dose for the treatment of patients in phase 2 and 3 studies. A criticism is that pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter estimates and variability in healthy volunteers are smaller than those in patients. In this study, the initial estimates of exposure from MCS were compared with actual exposure data in patients treated with ceftobiprole in a phase 3 nosocomial-pneumonia (NP) study (NTC00210964). Results of MCS using population PK data from ceftobiprole derived from 12 healthy volunteers were used (J. W. Mouton, A. Schmitt-Hoffmann, S. Shapiro, N. Nashed, N. C. Punt, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:1713-1718, 2004). Actual individual exposures in patients were derived after building a population pharmacokinetic model and were used to calculate the individual exposure to ceftobiprole (the percentage of time the unbound concentration exceeds the MIC [percent fT > MIC]) for a range of MIC values. For the ranges of percent fT > MIC used to determine the dosage schedule in the phase 3 NP study, the MCS using data from a single phase 1 study in healthy volunteers accurately predicted the actual clinical exposure to ceftobiprole. The difference at 50% fT > MIC at an MIC of 4 mg/liter was 3.5% for PK-sampled patients. For higher values of percent fT > MIC and MICs, the MCS slightly underestimated the target attainment, probably due to extreme values in the PK profile distribution used in the simulations. The probability of target attainment based on MCS in healthy volunteers adequately predicted the actual exposures in a patient population, including severely ill patients.

Citing Articles

Population Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Analysis for Maximizing the Effectiveness of Ceftobiprole in the Treatment of Severe Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcal Infections.

Cojutti P, Giuliano S, Pascale R, Angelini J, Tascini C, Viale P Microorganisms. 2023; 11(12).

PMID: 38138108 PMC: 10745581. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11122964.


Model-Based Approach for Optimizing Ceftobiprole Dosage in Pediatric Patients.

Rubino C, Cammarata A, Smits A, Schropf S, Polak M, Litherland K Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021; 65(11):e0120621.

PMID: 34398669 PMC: 8522765. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01206-21.


Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of single- and multiple-dose intravenous ceftobiprole in healthy Chinese participants.

Li W, Wu H, Chen Y, Guo B, Liu X, Wang Y Ann Transl Med. 2021; 9(11):936.

PMID: 34350251 PMC: 8263851. DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-588.


Ceftobiprole: pharmacokinetics and PK/PD profile.

Azanza Perea J, Sadaba Diaz de Rada B Rev Esp Quimioter. 2019; 32 Suppl 3:11-16.

PMID: 31364336 PMC: 6755345.


Mechanisms of action and antimicrobial activity of ceftobiprole.

Morosini M, Diez-Aguilar M, Canton R Rev Esp Quimioter. 2019; 32 Suppl 3:3-10.

PMID: 31364335 PMC: 6755350.


References
1.
Mouton J, Schmitt-Hoffmann A, Shapiro S, Nashed N, Punt N . Use of Monte Carlo simulations to select therapeutic doses and provisional breakpoints of BAL9141. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004; 48(5):1713-8. PMC: 400534. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.5.1713-1718.2004. View

2.
Drusano G . Antimicrobial pharmacodynamics: critical interactions of 'bug and drug'. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004; 2(4):289-300. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro862. View

3.
Kimko H, Murthy B, Xu X, Nandy P, Strauss R, Noel G . Population pharmacokinetic analysis of ceftobiprole for treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008; 53(3):1228-30. PMC: 2650522. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00632-08. View

4.
Roberts J, Kirkpatrick C, Lipman J . Monte Carlo simulations: maximizing antibiotic pharmacokinetic data to optimize clinical practice for critically ill patients. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010; 66(2):227-31. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkq449. View

5.
Mouton J, Punt N, Vinks A . A retrospective analysis using Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate recommended ceftazidime dosing regimens in healthy volunteers, patients with cystic fibrosis, and patients in the intensive care unit. Clin Ther. 2005; 27(6):762-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.06.013. View