Manipulation in the Enrollment of Research Participants
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Researchers can design recruitment and consent processes so that potential participants are more likely to decide to enroll. These strategies work by subtly manipulating the participants. But how much manipulation is acceptable?
FAIR BENEFITS AND ITS CRITICS: WHO IS RIGHT?.
Wendler D, Shah S J Health Care Law Policy. 2023; 20(1).
PMID: 37829823 PMC: 10569338.
Changing patient preferences toward better trial recruitment: an ethical analysis.
Al P, Hey S, Weijer C, Gillies K, McCleary N, Yee M Trials. 2023; 24(1):233.
PMID: 36973759 PMC: 10044713. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07258-4.
Reframing Recruitment: Evaluating Framing in Authorization for Research Contact Programs.
Speight C, Gregor C, Ko Y, Kraft S, Mitchell A, Niyibizi N AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2021; 12(3):206-213.
PMID: 33719913 PMC: 10788686. DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2021.1887962.
Henderson G, Waltz M, Meagher K, Cadigan R, Jupimai T, Isaacson S J Int AIDS Soc. 2019; 22(3):e25260.
PMID: 30869203 PMC: 6416664. DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25260.
Autonomy and couples' joint decision-making in healthcare.
Osamor P, Grady C BMC Med Ethics. 2018; 19(1):3.
PMID: 29325536 PMC: 5765707. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-017-0241-6.