» Articles » PMID: 23388632

Impact of Deleterious Passenger Mutations on Cancer Progression

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2013 Feb 8
PMID 23388632
Citations 164
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cancer progression is driven by the accumulation of a small number of genetic alterations. However, these few driver alterations reside in a cancer genome alongside tens of thousands of additional mutations termed passengers. Passengers are widely believed to have no role in cancer, yet many passengers fall within protein-coding genes and other functional elements that can have potentially deleterious effects on cancer cells. Here we investigate the potential of moderately deleterious passengers to accumulate and alter the course of neoplastic progression. Our approach combines evolutionary simulations of cancer progression with an analysis of cancer sequencing data. From simulations, we find that passengers accumulate and largely evade natural selection during progression. Although individually weak, the collective burden of passengers alters the course of progression, leading to several oncological phenomena that are hard to explain with a traditional driver-centric view. We then tested the predictions of our model using cancer genomics data and confirmed that many passengers are likely damaging and have largely evaded negative selection. Finally, we use our model to explore cancer treatments that exploit the load of passengers by either (i) increasing the mutation rate or (ii) exacerbating their deleterious effects. Though both approaches lead to cancer regression, the latter is a more effective therapy. Our results suggest a unique framework for understanding cancer progression as a balance of driver and passenger mutations.

Citing Articles

Biophysical Properties of Somatic Cancer Mutations in the S4 Transmembrane Segment of the Human Voltage-Gated Proton Channel hH1.

Jardin C, Derst C, Franzen A, Mahorivska I, DeCoursey T, Musset B Biomolecules. 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40001460 PMC: 11853527. DOI: 10.3390/biom15020156.


Cancers adapt to their mutational load by buffering protein misfolding stress.

Tilk S, Frydman J, Curtis C, Petrov D Elife. 2024; 12.

PMID: 39585785 PMC: 11588338. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.87301.


Oncometabolites at the crossroads of genetic, epigenetic and ecological alterations in cancer.

Lanzetti L Cell Death Differ. 2024; 31(12):1582-1594.

PMID: 39438765 PMC: 11618380. DOI: 10.1038/s41418-024-01402-6.


Plasminogen missense variants and their involvement in cardiovascular and inflammatory disease.

Brito-Robinson T, Ayinuola Y, Ploplis V, Castellino F Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1406953.

PMID: 38984351 PMC: 11231438. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1406953.


Spontaneous single-nucleotide substitutions and microsatellite mutations have distinct distributions of fitness effects.

Plavskin Y, Stella de Biase M, Ziv N, Janska L, Zhu Y, Hall D PLoS Biol. 2024; 22(7):e3002698.

PMID: 38950062 PMC: 11244821. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002698.


References
1.
Spencer S, Gerety R, Pienta K, Forrest S . Modeling somatic evolution in tumorigenesis. PLoS Comput Biol. 2006; 2(8):e108. PMC: 1550273. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020108. View

2.
LAIRD A . DYNAMICS OF TUMOR GROWTH. Br J Cancer. 1964; 13:490-502. PMC: 2071101. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1964.55. View

3.
Cole A, Myant K, Reed K, Ridgway R, Athineos D, van den Brink G . Cyclin D2-cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 is required for efficient proliferation and tumorigenesis following Apc loss. Cancer Res. 2010; 70(20):8149-58. PMC: 2974087. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0315. View

4.
Berger M, Hodis E, Heffernan T, Deribe Y, Lawrence M, Protopopov A . Melanoma genome sequencing reveals frequent PREX2 mutations. Nature. 2012; 485(7399):502-6. PMC: 3367798. DOI: 10.1038/nature11071. View

5.
Guthrie J . Effects of a synthetic antigonadotrophin (2-amino,5-nitrothiazole) on growth of experimental testicular teratomas. Br J Cancer. 1966; 20(3):582-7. PMC: 2008011. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1966.72. View