» Articles » PMID: 23385775

Memory for Surface Features of Unfamiliar Melodies: Independent Effects of Changes in Pitch and Tempo

Overview
Journal Psychol Res
Specialty Psychology
Date 2013 Feb 7
PMID 23385775
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A melody's identity is determined by relations between consecutive tones in terms of pitch and duration, whereas surface features (i.e., pitch level or key, tempo, and timbre) are irrelevant. Although surface features of highly familiar recordings are encoded into memory, little is known about listeners' mental representations of melodies heard once or twice. It is also unknown whether musical pitch is represented additively or interactively with temporal information. In two experiments, listeners heard unfamiliar melodies twice in an initial exposure phase. In a subsequent test phase, they heard the same (old) melodies interspersed with new melodies. Some of the old melodies were shifted in key, tempo, or key and tempo. Listeners' task was to rate how well they recognized each melody from the exposure phase while ignoring changes in key and tempo. Recognition ratings were higher for old melodies that stayed the same compared to those that were shifted in key or tempo, and detrimental effects of key and tempo changes were additive in between-subjects (Experiment 1) and within-subjects (Experiment 2) designs. The results confirm that surface features are remembered for melodies heard only twice. They also imply that key and tempo are processed and stored independently.

Citing Articles

Exploring the accuracy of musical tempo memory: The effects of reproduction method, reference tempo, and musical expertise.

Vigl J, Koehler F, Henning H Mem Cognit. 2024; 52(6):1299-1312.

PMID: 38507131 PMC: 11362532. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-024-01543-6.


Influence of surface features on the perception of nonadjacent musical phrases.

Spyra J, Woolhouse M Music Sci. 2023; 27(3):780-797.

PMID: 37711548 PMC: 10497395. DOI: 10.1177/10298649221148681.


Accuracy of Tempo Judgments in Disk Jockeys Compared to Musicians and Untrained Individuals.

Foster N, Beffa L, Lehmann A Front Psychol. 2021; 12:709979.

PMID: 34675835 PMC: 8525396. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.709979.


Listeners perceive complex pitch-temporal structure in melodies.

Prince J, Tan S, Schmuckler M Mem Cognit. 2019; 48(4):526-540.

PMID: 31820372 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-019-00987-5.


Recognition of transposed melodies: Effects of pitch distance and harmonic distance.

Kleinsmith A, Neill W Psychon Bull Rev. 2017; 25(5):1855-1860.

PMID: 29181781 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-017-1406-5.


References
1.
Plantinga J, Trainor L . Memory for melody: infants use a relative pitch code. Cognition. 2005; 98(1):1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.09.008. View

2.
van Egmond R, Povel D, Maris E . The influence of height and key on the perceptual similarity of transposed melodies. Percept Psychophys. 1996; 58(8):1252-9. DOI: 10.3758/bf03207557. View

3.
Smith N, Schmuckler M . Dial A440 for absolute pitch: absolute pitch memory by non-absolute pitch possessors. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008; 123(4):EL77-84. DOI: 10.1121/1.2896106. View

4.
Bergeson T, Trehub S . Absolute pitch and tempo in mothers' songs to infants. Psychol Sci. 2002; 13(1):72-5. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00413. View

5.
Schellenberg E . Expectancy in melody: tests of the implication-realization model. Cognition. 1996; 58(1):75-125. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00665-6. View