» Articles » PMID: 2017033

Some Influences of Accent Structure on Melody Recognition

Overview
Journal Mem Cognit
Specialty Psychology
Date 1991 Jan 1
PMID 2017033
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Two experiments were carried out to investigate the roles of joint accent structure and familiarity in delayed recognition of relatively long tonal melodies. Melodic themes of target melodies were defined by correlating contour-related pitch accents with temporal accents (accent coupling) during an initial familiarization phase. Later, subjects gave recognition responses to key-transposed versions of the target melodies as well as to decoys with same and different contour accent patterns. In Experiment 1, all to-be-recognized melodies occurred both in an original rhythm, which preserved accent coupling, and in a new rhythm, which did not. Listeners were best at distinguishing targets from different decoys, especially in the original rhythm. In Experiment 2, the familiarity of target tunes and the rhythmic similarity in recognition were varied. Similar rhythms preserved accent coupling, whereas dissimilar rhythms did not. Listeners were most adept in distinguishing familiar targets from different decoys (Experiment 2A), particularly when they appeared in novel but similar rhythms. However, in similar rhythm conditions, listeners also frequently mistook same decoys for targets. With less familiar targets (Experiment 2B), these effects were attenuated, and performance showed general effects of pitch contour.

Citing Articles

The Pastoral Origin of Semiotically Functional Tonal Organization of Music.

Nikolsky A Front Psychol. 2020; 11:1358.

PMID: 32848961 PMC: 7396614. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01358.


Working Memory for Sequences of Temporal Durations Reveals a Volatile Single-Item Store.

Manohar S, Husain M Front Psychol. 2016; 7:1655.

PMID: 27833574 PMC: 5080358. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01655.


Surface and structural effects of pitch and time on global melodic expectancies.

Prince J, Loo L Psychol Res. 2016; 81(1):255-270.

PMID: 26757926 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-015-0737-y.


Memory for surface features of unfamiliar melodies: independent effects of changes in pitch and tempo.

Schellenberg E, Stalinski S, Marks B Psychol Res. 2013; 78(1):84-95.

PMID: 23385775 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-013-0483-y.


Rhythm evokes action: early processing of metric deviances in expressive music by experts and laymen revealed by ERP source imaging.

James C, Michel C, Britz J, Vuilleumier P, Hauert C Hum Brain Mapp. 2011; 33(12):2751-67.

PMID: 21932257 PMC: 6870197. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.21397.


References
1.
Deutsch D . The processing of structured and unstructured tonal sequences. Percept Psychophys. 1980; 28(5):381-9. DOI: 10.3758/bf03204881. View

2.
Jones M . Time, our lost dimension: toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory. Psychol Rev. 1976; 83(5):323-55. View

3.
Jones M . Dynamic pattern structure in music: recent theory and research. Percept Psychophys. 1987; 41(6):621-34. DOI: 10.3758/bf03210494. View

4.
Dyson M, Watkins A . A figural approach to the role of melodic contour in melody recognition. Percept Psychophys. 1984; 35(5):477-88. DOI: 10.3758/bf03203924. View

5.
Jones M, Boltz M . Dynamic attending and responses to time. Psychol Rev. 1989; 96(3):459-91. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.96.3.459. View