» Articles » PMID: 23373567

Radiographic Predictors of Delayed Instability Following Decompression Without Fusion for Degenerative Grade I Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Overview
Date 2013 Feb 5
PMID 23373567
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Object: It is not known whether adding fusion to lumbar decompression is necessary for all patients undergoing surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with symptomatic stenosis. Determining specific radiographic traits that might predict delayed instability following decompression surgery might guide clinical decision making regarding the utility of up-front fusion in patients with degenerative Grade I spondylolisthesis.

Methods: Patients with Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (3-14 mm) with symptomatic stenosis were prospectively enrolled from a single site between May 2002 and September 2009 and treated with decompressive laminectomy without fusion. Patients with mechanical back pain or with gross motion (> 3 mm) on flexion-extension lumbar radiographs were excluded. The baseline radiographic variables measured included amount of slippage, disc height, facet angle, motion at spondylolisthesis (flexion-extension), and sagittal rotation angle. Data were analyzed using multivariate forward selection stepwise logistic regression, chi-square tests, Student t-test, and ANOVA.

Results: Forty patients were enrolled and treated with laminectomy without fusion, and all patients had complete radiographic data sets that were available for analysis. Reoperation was performed in 15 (37.5%) of 40 patients, with a mean follow-up duration of 3.6 years. Reoperation was performed for pain caused by instability at the index level in all 15 cases. Using multivariate stepwise logistic regression with a threshold p value of 0.35, motion at spondylolisthesis, disc height, and facet angle were predictors of reoperation following surgery. Facet angle > 50° was associated with a 39% rate of reoperation, disc height > 6.5 mm was associated with a 45% rate of reoperation, and motion at spondylolisthesis > 1.25 mm was associated with a 54% rate of reoperation. Patients with all 3 risk factors for instability had a 75% rate of reoperation, whereas patients with no risk factors for instability had a 0% rate of reoperation (p = 0.14).

Conclusions: Patients with motion at spondylolisthesis > 1.25 mm, disc height > 6.5 mm, and facet angle > 50° are more likely to experience instability following decompression surgery for Grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis. Identification of key risk factors for instability might improve patient selection for decompression without fusion surgery.

Citing Articles

Are Randomized Trials Better? Comparison of Baseline Covariate Balance of a Propensity Score-Balanced Lumbar Spine IDE Trial and Comparable RCTs.

Maislin G, Keenan B, Alamin T, Fielding L, Scherman A, Hachadoorian R Global Spine J. 2025; :21925682251316287.

PMID: 39868633 PMC: 11773497. DOI: 10.1177/21925682251316287.


What Radiographic and Spinopelvic Parameters do Spine Surgeons Consider in Decision-Making for Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis?.

Cabrera J, Virk M, Cho S, Muthu S, Ambrosio L, Yoon S Global Spine J. 2024; :21925682241306105.

PMID: 39630131 PMC: 11618860. DOI: 10.1177/21925682241306105.


Challenges in Contemporary Spine Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of Surgical, Technological, and Patient-Specific Issues.

Mensah E, Chalif J, Baker J, Chalif E, Biundo J, Groff M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(18).

PMID: 39336947 PMC: 11432351. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13185460.


Clinical outcomes of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression for the treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis associated with spinal stenosis in elderly individuals: a matched comparison study.

Fan N, Song H, Zang L, Wang A, Wang T, Yuan S Int Orthop. 2024; 48(12):3197-3205.

PMID: 39320498 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-024-06318-x.


Rate of Reoperation Following Decompression-Only Procedure for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review of Literature.

Muthu S, Corluka S, Buser Z, Malcolm J, Luo Z, Gollahalli Shivashankar P JB JS Open Access. 2024; 9(3).

PMID: 38974406 PMC: 11221853. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00163.