» Articles » PMID: 23372651

Mortality and Medical Care After Bereavement: a General Practice Cohort Study

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Feb 2
PMID 23372651
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bereaved spouses or partners are thought to be at increased risk of morbidity and mortality. However, there are few large prospective studies and results are inconsistent. We estimated the relative mortality, prescription of psychotropic medication and use of primary medical care services in adults whose cohabitee died of cancer. To do this, we undertook a cohort study using The Health Improvement Network (THIN) UK primary care database. Participants were 1) people aged over 40, who were registered with general practices and had been exposed to the death of a cohabitee from cancer; and 2) a comparison cohort frequency matched on five year age bands and sex who were cohabiting with a living partner. The baseline was chosen as six months before the date of the cancer death for the exposed group and a random date for the unexposed group. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using random effects Poisson regression to account for clustering within general practices and adjusting for other key variables. 92,129 patients were studied for a median follow up of 4 years. Cohabitees of patients who died of cancer were less likely to die of any cause (IRR 0.71, CI 0.68-0.74) after adjustment for age, gender, number of non-psychotropic prescriptions 6 months before the cancer death/index date, use of psychotropic medication 6 months before the cancer death/index date, smoking, alcohol and area deprivation score. Exposed patients were more likely to receive a prescription for antidepressant or hypnotic medication and to attend their GP both before and after the death of the cohabitee. In conclusion, we did not confirm increased mortality in cohabitees of people dying from cancer.

Citing Articles

A survey of palliative care domains and the palliative care provision confidence of Thai family practitioners.

Wongprom I, Chaithanasarn A BMC Palliat Care. 2023; 22(1):147.

PMID: 37794416 PMC: 10552241. DOI: 10.1186/s12904-023-01272-8.


Bereavement in critical care: A narrative review and practice exploration of current provision of support services and future challenges.

Pattison N, White C, Lone N J Intensive Care Soc. 2022; 22(4):349-356.

PMID: 35154374 PMC: 8829769. DOI: 10.1177/1751143720928898.


Bereavement care during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Pearce C, Wong G, Barclay S Br J Gen Pract. 2021; 71(706):198-199.

PMID: 33926868 PMC: 8087313. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp21X715625.


The prevalence of severe grief reactions after bereavement and their associations with mental health, physical health, and health service utilization: a population-based study.

Thimm J, Kristoffersen A, Ringberg U Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021; 11(1):1844440.

PMID: 33408813 PMC: 7748058. DOI: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1844440.


Gender differential impact of bereavement on health outcomes: evidence from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, 2011-2015.

Chen Z, Ying J, Ingles J, Zhang D, Rajbhandari-Thapa J, Wang R BMC Psychiatry. 2020; 20(1):514.

PMID: 33092555 PMC: 7583229. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-020-02916-2.


References
1.
Lis Y, Mann R . The VAMP Research multi-purpose database in the U.K. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995; 48(3):431-43. DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)00137-f. View

2.
Schaefer C, Quesenberry Jr C, Wi S . Mortality following conjugal bereavement and the effects of a shared environment. Am J Epidemiol. 1995; 141(12):1142-52. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117387. View

3.
Blyth A . Audit of terminal care in a general practice. BMJ. 1990; 300(6730):983-6. PMC: 1662689. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.300.6730.983. View

4.
Gunnell D . Terminal care in general practice. BMJ. 1990; 300(6736):1400-1. PMC: 1663011. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.300.6736.1400-e. View

5.
Khan N, Harrison S, Rose P . Validity of diagnostic coding within the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2010; 60(572):e128-36. PMC: 2828861. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp10X483562. View