» Articles » PMID: 23361063

Words and Objects at the Tip of the Left Temporal Lobe in Primary Progressive Aphasia

Overview
Journal Brain
Specialty Neurology
Date 2013 Jan 31
PMID 23361063
Citations 113
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Eleven of 69 prospectively enrolled primary progressive aphasics were selected for this study because of peak atrophy sites located predominantly or exclusively within the anterior left temporal lobe. Cortical volumes in these areas were reduced to less than half of control values, whereas average volume elsewhere in the left hemisphere deviated from control values by only 8%. Failure to name objects emerged as the most consistent and severe deficit. Naming errors were attributed to pure retrieval failure if the object could not be named even when the denoting word was understood, the object recognized and the two accurately matched. Surprisingly many of the naming errors reflected pure retrieval failures, without discernible semantic or associative component. The remaining set of errors had associative components. These errors reflected the inability to define the word denoting the object more often than the inability to define the nature of the pictured object. In a separate task where the same object had to be linked to verbal or non-verbal associations, performance was abnormal only in the verbal format. Excessive taxonomic interference was observed for picture-word, but not picture-picture, matching tasks. This excessive interference reflected a blurring of intra- rather than inter-category distinctions as if the acuity of word-object associations had been diminished so that correspondences were easier to recognize at generic than specific levels. These dissociations between verbal and non-verbal markers of object knowledge indicate that the reduced neural mass at peak atrophy sites of the left temporal tip, accounting for half or more of the presumed premorbid volume, was unlikely to have contained domain-independent semantic representations of the type that would be expected in a strictly amodal hub. A more likely arrangement entails two highly interactive routes--a strongly left lateralized temporosylvian language network for verbal concepts, and a presumably more bilateral or right-sided inferotemporal/fusiform object recognition network, which remained relatively spared because peak atrophy sites were concentrated on the left. The current results also suggest that the left anterior temporal neocortex should be inserted into the language network where it is likely to play a major role in selecting verbal labels for objects and mediating the progression of word comprehension from generic to specific levels of precision.

Citing Articles

Monkeys can identify pictures from words.

Cabrera-Ruiz E, Alva M, Trevino M, Mata-Herrera M, Vergara J, Figueroa T PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0317183.

PMID: 39937708 PMC: 11819547. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317183.


Neural populations in the language network differ in the size of their temporal receptive windows.

Regev T, Casto C, Hosseini E, Adamek M, Ritaccio A, Willie J Nat Hum Behav. 2024; 8(10):1924-1942.

PMID: 39187713 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-01944-2.


A Rose by Any Other Name: Mapping Taxonomic and Thematic Naming Errors Poststroke.

Riccardi N, Schwen Blackett D, Broadhead A, den Ouden D, Rorden C, Fridriksson J J Cogn Neurosci. 2024; 36(10):2251-2267.

PMID: 39106171 PMC: 11792165. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_02236.


Appraising Linguistic and Reading Impairments in Kannada-Speaking Persons With Central Alexia.

Swamy A, Goswami S Cureus. 2024; 16(6):e63437.

PMID: 39077278 PMC: 11284617. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.63437.


Clinical and neuroanatomical characterization of the semantic behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia in a multicenter Italian cohort.

Ghirelli A, Spinelli E, Canu E, Basaia S, Castelnovo V, Cecchetti G J Neurol. 2024; 271(7):4203-4215.

PMID: 38597943 PMC: 11233398. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-024-12338-9.


References
1.
Jefferies E, Lambon Ralph M . Semantic impairment in stroke aphasia versus semantic dementia: a case-series comparison. Brain. 2006; 129(Pt 8):2132-47. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awl153. View

2.
Genovese C, Lazar N, Nichols T . Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. Neuroimage. 2002; 15(4):870-8. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.1037. View

3.
Zannino G, Perri R, Pasqualetti P, Di Paola M, Caltagirone C, Carlesimo G . The role of semantic distance in category-specific impairments for living things: evidence from a case of semantic dementia. Neuropsychologia. 2005; 44(7):1017-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.11.006. View

4.
Robson H, Sage K, Lambon Ralph M . Wernicke's aphasia reflects a combination of acoustic-phonological and semantic control deficits: a case-series comparison of Wernicke's aphasia, semantic dementia and semantic aphasia. Neuropsychologia. 2011; 50(2):266-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.11.021. View

5.
Walker G, Schwartz M, Kimberg D, Faseyitan O, Brecher A, Dell G . Support for anterior temporal involvement in semantic error production in aphasia: new evidence from VLSM. Brain Lang. 2010; 117(3):110-22. PMC: 3037437. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.09.008. View