» Articles » PMID: 36130104

Precision FMRI Reveals That the Language-selective Network Supports Both Phrase-structure Building and Lexical Access During Language Production

Overview
Journal Cereb Cortex
Specialty Neurology
Date 2022 Sep 21
PMID 36130104
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A fronto-temporal brain network has long been implicated in language comprehension. However, this network's role in language production remains debated. In particular, it remains unclear whether all or only some language regions contribute to production, and which aspects of production these regions support. Across 3 functional magnetic resonance imaging experiments that rely on robust individual-subject analyses, we characterize the language network's response to high-level production demands. We report 3 novel results. First, sentence production, spoken or typed, elicits a strong response throughout the language network. Second, the language network responds to both phrase-structure building and lexical access demands, although the response to phrase-structure building is stronger and more spatially extensive, present in every language region. Finally, contra some proposals, we find no evidence of brain regions-within or outside the language network-that selectively support phrase-structure building in production relative to comprehension. Instead, all language regions respond more strongly during production than comprehension, suggesting that production incurs a greater cost for the language network. Together, these results align with the idea that language comprehension and production draw on the same knowledge representations, which are stored in a distributed manner within the language-selective network and are used to both interpret and generate linguistic utterances.

Citing Articles

Neural encoding of semantic structures during sentence production.

Giglio L, Hagoort P, Ostarek M Cereb Cortex. 2024; 34(12).

PMID: 39716739 PMC: 11666472. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhae482.


Decoding words during sentence production: Syntactic role encoding and structure-dependent dynamics revealed by ECoG.

Morgan A, Devinsky O, Doyle W, Dugan P, Friedman D, Flinker A bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39554006 PMC: 11565881. DOI: 10.1101/2024.10.30.621177.


The language network ages well: Preserved selectivity, lateralization, and within-network functional synchronization in older brains.

Billot A, Jhingan N, Varkanitsa M, Blank I, Ryskin R, Kiran S bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39484368 PMC: 11527140. DOI: 10.1101/2024.10.23.619954.


Connectivity of Fronto-Temporal Regions in Syntactic Structure Building During Speaking and Listening.

Giglio L, Sharoh D, Ostarek M, Hagoort P Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2024; 5(4):922-941.

PMID: 39439740 PMC: 11495677. DOI: 10.1162/nol_a_00154.


Neural populations in the language network differ in the size of their temporal receptive windows.

Regev T, Casto C, Hosseini E, Adamek M, Ritaccio A, Willie J Nat Hum Behav. 2024; 8(10):1924-1942.

PMID: 39187713 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-01944-2.


References
1.
Miozzo M, Pulvermuller F, Hauk O . Early Parallel Activation of Semantics and Phonology in Picture Naming: Evidence from a Multiple Linear Regression MEG Study. Cereb Cortex. 2014; 25(10):3343-55. PMC: 4585490. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhu137. View

2.
Mollica F, Siegelman M, Diachek E, Piantadosi S, Mineroff Z, Futrell R . Composition is the Core Driver of the Language-selective Network. Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2023; 1(1):104-134. PMC: 9923699. DOI: 10.1162/nol_a_00005. View

3.
Butterworth B, Howard D . Paragrammatisms. Cognition. 1987; 26(1):1-37. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(87)90012-6. View

4.
Federmeier K . Thinking ahead: the role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. Psychophysiology. 2007; 44(4):491-505. PMC: 2712632. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00531.x. View

5.
Vagharchakian L, Dehaene-Lambertz G, Pallier C, Dehaene S . A temporal bottleneck in the language comprehension network. J Neurosci. 2012; 32(26):9089-102. PMC: 6622343. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5685-11.2012. View