» Articles » PMID: 23356476

Neighbourhood Safety and Leisure-time Physical Activity Among Dutch Adults: a Multilevel Perspective

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2013 Jan 30
PMID 23356476
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Several neighbourhood elements have been found to be related to leisure-time walking and cycling. However, the association with neighbourhood safety remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the association of neighbourhood-level safety with leisure-time walking and cycling among Dutch adults.

Methods: Data were derived from the national health survey (POLS) 2006-2009, with valid data on 20046 respondents residing in 2127 neighbourhoods. Multilevel logistic regression models were used to examine the association between neighbourhood-level safety (general safety and specific safety components: physical disorder, social disorder, crime-related fear, traffic safety) and residents' engagement in outdoor leisure-time walking and cycling for at least 30 minutes per week.

Results: An increase in neighbourhood safety (both general safety and each of the safety components) was significantly associated with an increase in leisure-time cycling participation. Associations were strongest for general safety and among older women. In the general population, neighbourhood safety was not significantly associated with leisure-time walking. However, among younger and older adult men and lower educated individuals, an increase in general safety was associated with a decrease in leisure-time walking participation.

Conclusions: In the Netherlands, neighbourhood safety appears to be related to leisure-time cycling but not to walking. Leisure-time cycling may best be encouraged by improving different safety components at once, rather than focusing on one safety aspect such as traffic safety. Special attention is needed for older women.

Citing Articles

Spatial accessibility to gun violence exposure on walkable routes to and from school.

Barboza-Salerno G, Duhaney S, Yang H SSM Popul Health. 2024; 28:101730.

PMID: 39649474 PMC: 11621795. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101730.


Leisure-Time Physical Activity Participation Trends 2014-2018: A Cross-Sectional Study in Poland.

Biernat E, Piatkowska M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(1).

PMID: 31892204 PMC: 6982099. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17010208.


The neighborhood social environment and physical activity: a systematic scoping review.

Kepper M, Myers C, Denstel K, Hunter R, Guan W, Broyles S Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019; 16(1):124.

PMID: 31815626 PMC: 6902518. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-019-0873-7.


Physical activity and sedentary behavior patterns and sociodemographic correlates in 116,982 adults from six South American countries: the South American physical activity and sedentary behavior network (SAPASEN).

Werneck A, Baldew S, Miranda J, Arnesto O, Stubbs B, Silva D Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019; 16(1):68.

PMID: 31429772 PMC: 6701122. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-019-0839-9.


Do Differences in Social Environments Explain Gender Differences in Recreational Walking across Neighbourhoods?.

Ghani F, Rachele J, Loh V, Washington S, Turrell G Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(11).

PMID: 31167430 PMC: 6604242. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16111980.


References
1.
Sallis J, Cervero R, Ascher W, Henderson K, Kraft M, Kerr J . An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006; 27:297-322. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102100. View

2.
Wagenmakers R, van den Akker-Scheek I, Groothoff J, Zijlstra W, Bulstra S, Kootstra J . Reliability and validity of the short questionnaire to assess health-enhancing physical activity (SQUASH) in patients after total hip arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008; 9:141. PMC: 2576250. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-141. View

3.
Giles-Corti B, Donovan R . Socioeconomic status differences in recreational physical activity levels and real and perceived access to a supportive physical environment. Prev Med. 2002; 35(6):601-11. DOI: 10.1006/pmed.2002.1115. View

4.
Humpel N, Owen N, Iverson D, Leslie E, Bauman A . Perceived environment attributes, residential location, and walking for particular purposes. Am J Prev Med. 2004; 26(2):119-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2003.10.005. View

5.
Ball K, Timperio A, Salmon J, Giles-Corti B, Roberts R, Crawford D . Personal, social and environmental determinants of educational inequalities in walking: a multilevel study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007; 61(2):108-14. PMC: 2465645. DOI: 10.1136/jech.2006.048520. View