» Articles » PMID: 23355748

Spatial Navigation Strategies in Peromyscus: a Comparative Study

Overview
Journal Anim Behav
Date 2013 Jan 29
PMID 23355748
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A male advantage in spatial abilities is predicted to evolve in species where males rely on expansion of home territory to locate dispersed mates during the breeding season. We sought to examine mechanistic underpinnings of this evolved trait by comparing spatial navigational abilities in two species of Peromyscus that employ widely different reproductive strategies. Males and females from outbred stocks of deer mice (P. maniculatus bairdii) in which males engage in territorial expansion and mate search and California mice (P. californicus insignis), in which males do not, were administered tasks that assessed spatial learning and memory, and activity and exploratory behaviours. The maze employed for these studies included four spatial cues that could be used to aid in locating 1 of 12 potential escape holes. As predicted, male deer mice outperformed conspecific females and California mice males in maze performance and memory, and this difference appeared to be due to extent to which animals used spatial cues to guide maze navigation. Consistent with territorial expansion as a component of competition for mates, male deer mice were more active and engaged in more exploratory and less anxiety-related behaviours than conspecific females and California mice males. The results have implications for understanding and studying the cognitive and behavioural mechanisms that have evolved through male-male competition that involves territorial expansion and mate search.

Citing Articles

Impacts of predation risk on learning and memory of free-living mice.

Ganci C, McKay L, Hunninck L, Sheriff M Proc Biol Sci. 2025; 292(2041):20241978.

PMID: 39999888 PMC: 11858748. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.1978.


Dorsal CA1 lesions of the hippocampus impact mating tactics in prairie voles by shifting non-monogamous males' use of space to resemble monogamous males.

Sailer L, Finton C, Patel P, Bogdanowicz S, Ophir A Front Behav Neurosci. 2024; 18:1355807.

PMID: 38468707 PMC: 10925758. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1355807.


Still little evidence sex differences in spatial navigation are evolutionary adaptations.

Hults C, Francis R, Clint E, Smith W, Sober E, Garland Jr T R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(1):231532.

PMID: 38234440 PMC: 10791541. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.231532.


Body mass and sex, but not breeding condition and season, influence open-field exploration in the yellow-necked mouse.

Bednarz P, Zwolak R Ecol Evol. 2022; 12(3):e8771.

PMID: 35356564 PMC: 8958246. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8771.


Mean Girls: Social Stress Models for Female Rodents.

Kuske J, Trainor B Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2021; 54:95-124.

PMID: 34532840 PMC: 9812211. DOI: 10.1007/7854_2021_247.


References
1.
Jacobs L, Gaulin S, Sherry D, Hoffman G . Evolution of spatial cognition: sex-specific patterns of spatial behavior predict hippocampal size. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990; 87(16):6349-52. PMC: 54531. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.87.16.6349. View

2.
Batty E, Hoban L, Spetch M, Dickson C . Rats' use of geometric, featural and orientation cues to locate a hidden goal. Behav Processes. 2009; 82(3):327-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.08.002. View

3.
Cheng K . Whither geometry? Troubles of the geometric module. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008; 12(9):355-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.06.004. View

4.
Palanza P, Gioiosa L, Parmigiani S . Social stress in mice: gender differences and effects of estrous cycle and social dominance. Physiol Behav. 2001; 73(3):411-20. DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(01)00494-2. View

5.
Galea L, Kavaliers M, Ossenkopp K, Innes D, Hargreaves E . Sexually dimorphic spatial learning varies seasonally in two populations of deer mice. Brain Res. 1994; 635(1-2):18-26. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)91419-2. View