» Articles » PMID: 23344501

Construction of Lactose-consuming Saccharomyces Cerevisiae for Lactose Fermentation into Ethanol Fuel

Overview
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2013 Jan 25
PMID 23344501
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Two lactose-consuming diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains, AY-51024A and AY-51024M, were constructed by expressing the LAC4 and LAC12 genes of Kluyveromyces marxianus in the host strain AY-5. In AY-51024A, both genes were targeted to the ATH1 and NTH1 gene-encoding regions to abolish the activity of acid/neutral trehalase. In AY-51024M, both genes were respectively integrated into the MIG1 and NTH1 gene-encoding regions to relieve glucose repression. Physiologic studies of the two transformants under anaerobic cultivations in glucose and galactose media indicated that the expression of both LAC genes did not physiologically burden the cells, except for AY-51024A in glucose medium. Galactose consumption was initiated at higher glucose concentrations in the MIG1 deletion strain AY-51024M than in the corresponding wild-type strain and AY-51024A, wherein galactose was consumed until glucose was completely depleted in the mixture. In lactose medium, the Sp. growth rates of AY-51024A and AY-51024M under anaerobic shake-flasks were 0.025 and 0.067 h(-1), respectively. The specific lactose uptake rate and ethanol production of AY-51024M were 2.50 g lactose g CDW(-1) h(-1) and 23.4 g l(-1), respectively, whereas those of AY-51024A were 0.98 g lactose g CDW(-1) h(-1) and 24.3 g lactose g CDW(-1) h(-1), respectively. In concentrated cheese whey powder solutions, AY-51024M produced 63.3 g l(-1) ethanol from approximately 150 g l(-1) initial lactose in 120 h, conversely, AY-51024A consumed 63.7 % of the initial lactose and produced 35.9 g l(-1) ethanol. Therefore, relieving glucose repression is an effective strategy for constructing lactose-consuming S. cerevisiae.

Citing Articles

Process scale-up simulation and techno-economic assessment of ethanol fermentation from cheese whey.

Colacicco M, De Micco C, Macrelli S, Agrimi G, Janssen M, Bettiga M Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod. 2024; 17(1):124.

PMID: 39342290 PMC: 11439329. DOI: 10.1186/s13068-024-02567-5.


Functional Characterization of Sugar Transporter CRT1 Reveals Differential Roles of Its C-Terminal Region in Sugar Transport and Cellulase Induction in Trichoderma reesei.

Wang Z, Yang R, Lv W, Zhang W, Meng X, Liu W Microbiol Spectr. 2022; 10(4):e0087222.

PMID: 35852347 PMC: 9431493. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.00872-22.


Past, Present, and Future Perspectives on Whey as a Promising Feedstock for Bioethanol Production by Yeast.

Zou J, Chang X J Fungi (Basel). 2022; 8(4).

PMID: 35448626 PMC: 9031875. DOI: 10.3390/jof8040395.


Uncoupling glucose sensing from GAL metabolism for heterologous lactose fermentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Zou J, Chen X, Hu Y, Xiao D, Guo X, Chang X Biotechnol Lett. 2021; 43(8):1607-1616.

PMID: 33937967 DOI: 10.1007/s10529-021-03136-8.


Effect of the inactivation of lactate dehydrogenase, ethanol dehydrogenase, and phosphotransacetylase on 2,3-butanediol production in Klebsiella pneumoniae strain.

Guo X, Cao C, Wang Y, Li C, Wu M, Chen Y Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014; 7(1):44.

PMID: 24669952 PMC: 3974439. DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-7-44.

References
1.
Klein C, Olsson L, Nielsen J . Glucose control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the role of Mig1 in metabolic functions. Microbiology (Reading). 1998; 144 ( Pt 1):13-24. DOI: 10.1099/00221287-144-1-13. View

2.
Verduyn C, Postma E, Scheffers W, van Dijken J . Physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in anaerobic glucose-limited chemostat cultures. J Gen Microbiol. 1990; 136(3):395-403. DOI: 10.1099/00221287-136-3-395. View

3.
Bradford M . A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976; 72:248-54. DOI: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. View

4.
Rubio-Texeira M . A comparative analysis of the GAL genetic switch between not-so-distant cousins: Saccharomyces cerevisiae versus Kluyveromyces lactis. FEMS Yeast Res. 2005; 5(12):1115-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.femsyr.2005.05.003. View

5.
Klein C, Olsson L, Ronnow B, Mikkelsen J, Nielsen J . Alleviation of glucose repression of maltose metabolism by MIG1 disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996; 62(12):4441-9. PMC: 168270. DOI: 10.1128/aem.62.12.4441-4449.1996. View