» Articles » PMID: 23343392

Partnership for Fragility Bone Fracture Care Provision and Prevention Program (P4Bones): Study Protocol for a Secondary Fracture Prevention Pragmatic Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background: Fractures associated with bone fragility in older adults signal the potential for secondary fracture. Fragility fractures often precipitate further decline in health and loss of mobility, with high associated costs for patients, families, society and the healthcare system. Promptly initiating a coordinated, comprehensive pharmacological bone health and falls prevention program post-fracture may improve osteoporosis treatment compliance; and reduce rates of falls and secondary fractures, and associated morbidity, mortality and costs.

Methods/design: This pragmatic, controlled trial at 11 hospital sites in eight regions in Quebec, Canada, will recruit community-dwelling patients over age 50 who have sustained a fragility fracture to an intervention coordinated program or to standard care, according to the site. Site study coordinators will identify and recruit 1,596 participants for each study arm. Coordinators at intervention sites will facilitate continuity of care for bone health, and arrange fall prevention programs including physical exercise. The intervention teams include medical bone specialists, primary care physicians, pharmacists, nurses, rehabilitation clinicians, and community program organizers.The primary outcome of this study is the incidence of secondary fragility fractures within an 18-month follow-up period. Secondary outcomes include initiation and compliance with bone health medication; time to first fall and number of clinically significant falls; fall-related hospitalization and mortality; physical activity; quality of life; fragility fracture-related costs; admission to a long term care facility; participants' perceptions of care integration, expectations and satisfaction with the program; and participants' compliance with the fall prevention program. Finally, professionals at intervention sites will participate in focus groups to identify barriers and facilitating factors for the integrated fragility fracture prevention program.This integrated program will facilitate knowledge translation and dissemination via the following: involvement of various collaborators during the development and set-up of the integrated program; distribution of pamphlets about osteoporosis and fall prevention strategies to primary care physicians in the intervention group and patients in the control group; participation in evaluation activities; and eventual dissemination of study results.

Citing Articles

Preventing hip fractures with multidisciplinary teams: a Canadian perspective.

Sanders E, Dobransky J, Cheaitani L, Harris N, Liew A, Papp S Can J Surg. 2021; 64(3):E310-E316.

PMID: 34038059 PMC: 8327994. DOI: 10.1503/cjs.014219.


Implementing a fracture follow-up liaison service: perspective of key stakeholders.

Luc M, Corriveau H, Boire G, Filiatrault J, Beaulieu M, Dagenais P Rheumatol Int. 2019; 40(4):607-614.

PMID: 31501995 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-019-04413-6.


Patient-Related Factors Associated with Adherence to Recommendations Made by a Fracture Liaison Service: A Mixed-Method Prospective Study.

Luc M, Corriveau H, Boire G, Filiatrault J, Beaulieu M, Gaboury I Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018; 15(5).

PMID: 29747415 PMC: 5981983. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15050944.


Evaluation of a "Just-in-Time" Nurse Consultation on Bone Health: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Roblin D, Zelman D, Plummer S, Robinson B, Lou Y, Edmonds S Perm J. 2017; 21:16-112.

PMID: 28746019 PMC: 5528825. DOI: 10.7812/TPP/16-112.


District nurses' perceptions of osteoporosis management: a qualitative study.

Claesson A, Toth-Pal E, Piispanen P, Salminen H Osteoporos Int. 2015; 26(7):1911-8.

PMID: 25792490 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-015-3086-1.


References
1.
Cauley J, Thompson D, Ensrud K, Scott J, Black D . Risk of mortality following clinical fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2000; 11(7):556-61. DOI: 10.1007/s001980070075. View

2.
Garasen H, Johnsen R . The quality of communication about older patients between hospital physicians and general practitioners: a panel study assessment. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007; 7:133. PMC: 2014755. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-133. View

3.
Hsieh H, Shannon S . Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005; 15(9):1277-88. DOI: 10.1177/1049732305276687. View

4.
Ganz D, Higashi T, Rubenstein L . Monitoring falls in cohort studies of community-dwelling older people: effect of the recall interval. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006; 53(12):2190-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00509.x. View

5.
Roland M, Torgerson D . What are pragmatic trials?. BMJ. 1998; 316(7127):285. PMC: 2665488. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.316.7127.285. View