» Articles » PMID: 25792490

District Nurses' Perceptions of Osteoporosis Management: a Qualitative Study

Overview
Journal Osteoporos Int
Date 2015 Mar 21
PMID 25792490
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: Underdiagnosis of osteoporosis is common. This study investigated Swedish district nurses' perceptions of osteoporosis management. They perceived the condition as having low priority, and the consequences of this perception were insufficient awareness of the condition and perceptions of bone-specific medication as unsafe. They perceived, though, competency when working with fall prevention.

Introduction: Undertreatment of patients with osteoporosis is common. Sweden's medical care strategy dictates prioritisation of various conditions; while guidelines exist, osteoporosis is not prioritised. The aim of this study was to investigate district nurses' perceptions of osteoporosis management within Sweden's primary health care system.

Methods: Four semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted with 13 female district nurses. The interviews were analysed using thematic analysis.

Results: The overall theme was perceiving osteoporosis management as ambiguous. The themes were perceiving barriers and perceiving opportunities. These subthemes were linked to perceiving barriers: (i) insufficient procedures, lack of time and not aware of the condition; (ii) insufficient knowledge about diagnosis and about fracture risk assessment tools; (iii) low priority condition and unclear responsibility for osteoporosis management; and (iv) bone-specific medication was sometimes perceived to be unsafe. These subthemes were linked to perceiving opportunities: (i) professional competency when discussing fall prevention in home visit programs, (ii) willingness to learn more about osteoporosis management, (iii) collaboration with other professionals and (iv) willingness to identify individuals at high risk of fracture.

Conclusions: Osteoporosis was reported, by the district nurses, to be a low-priority condition with consequences being unawareness of the condition, insufficient knowledge about bone-specific medications, fracture risk assessment tools and procedures. These may be some of the explanations for the undertreatment of osteoporosis. At the same time, the district nurses described competency performing the home visits, which emerged as an optimal opportunity to discuss fall prevention and to introduce FRAX with the aim to identify individuals at high risk of fracture.

Citing Articles

Perspectives of healthcare providers on osteoporosis, falls and fracture risk: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.

Cho C, Bak G, Sumpton D, Richards B, Sherrington C Arch Osteoporos. 2024; 19(1):90.

PMID: 39313605 PMC: 11420259. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-024-01446-8.


Healthcare professionals' perspectives and experiences of osteoporosis medication treatment: a qualitative systematic review.

Rezae F, Kelly A, Dey S, Moles R, Carter S Arch Osteoporos. 2024; 19(1):8.

PMID: 38191760 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-023-01359-y.


Osteoporosis guideline awareness among Iranian nurses: results of a knowledge and attitudes survey.

Mahdaviazad H, Keshtkar V, Emami M, Kargarshouroki Z, Vosoughi A J Prev Med Hyg. 2021; 62(2):E415-E420.

PMID: 34604582 PMC: 8451363. DOI: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2021.62.2.1738.


Strategies for the implementation of an electronic fracture risk assessment tool in long term care: a qualitative study.

Bai Y, McArthur C, Ioannidis G, Giangregorio L, Straus S, Papaioannou A BMC Geriatr. 2021; 21(1):467.

PMID: 34418976 PMC: 8379826. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02388-3.


Primary care physicians' views on osteoporosis management: a qualitative study.

Salminen H, Piispanen P, Toth-Pal E Arch Osteoporos. 2019; 14(1):48.

PMID: 31028556 PMC: 6486622. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-019-0599-9.


References
1.
Twohig P, Putnam W . Group interviews in primary care research: advancing the state of the art or ritualized research?. Fam Pract. 2002; 19(3):278-84. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/19.3.278. View

2.
Pham A, Datta S, Weber T, Walter L, Colon-Emeric C . Cost-effectiveness of oral bisphosphonates for osteoporosis at different ages and levels of life expectancy. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011; 59(9):1642-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03571.x. View

3.
Giangregorio L, Fisher P, Papaioannou A, Adachi J . Osteoporosis knowledge and information needs in healthcare professionals caring for patients with fragility fractures. Orthop Nurs. 2007; 26(1):27-35. PMC: 5110320. DOI: 10.1097/00006416-200701000-00009. View

4.
Otmar R, Reventlow S, Nicholson G, Kotowicz M, Pasco J . General medical practitioners' knowledge and beliefs about osteoporosis and its investigation and management. Arch Osteoporos. 2012; 7:107-14. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-012-0088-x. View

5.
Hoang-Kim A, Schemitsch E, Sale J, Beaton D, Warmington K, Kulkarni A . Understanding osteoporosis and fractures: an introduction to the use of qualitative research. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013; 134(2):207-17. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-013-1799-1. View