» Articles » PMID: 23341870

High Osmolality Vitrification: a New Method for the Simple and Temperature-permissive Cryopreservation of Mouse Embryos

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Jan 24
PMID 23341870
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Procedures for cryopreserving embryos vary considerably, each having its specific advantages and disadvantages in terms of technical feasibility, embryo survival yield, temperature permissibility and species- or strain-dependent applicability. Here we report a high osmolality vitrification (HOV) method that is advantageous in these respects. Cryopreservation by vitrification is generally very simple, but, unlike slow freezing, embryos should be kept at a supercooling temperature (below -130°C) to avoid cryodamage. We overcame this problem by using an HOV solution containing 42.5% (v/v) ethylene glycol, 17.3% (w/v) Ficoll and 1.0 M sucrose. This solution is more viscous than other cryopreservation solutions, but easy handling of embryos was assured by employing a less viscous equilibration solution before vitrification. Most (>80%) embryos cryopreserved in this solution survived at -80°C for at least 30 days. Normal mice were recovered even after intercontinental transportation in a conventional dry-ice package for 2-3 days, indicating that special containers such as dry shippers with liquid nitrogen vapor are unnecessary. The HOV solution could also be employed for long-term storage in liquid nitrogen, as with other conventional cryoprotectants. Finally, we confirmed that this new vitrification method could be applied successfully to embryos of all six strains of mice we have tested so far. Thus, our HOV method provides an efficient and reliable strategy for the routine cryopreservation of mouse embryos in animal facilities and biomedical laboratories, and for easy and cheap transportation.

Citing Articles

Beyond Earth's bounds: navigating the frontiers of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) in space.

Chaplia O, Mathyk B, Nichols-Burns S, Basar M, Halicigil C Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024; 22(1):123.

PMID: 39394617 PMC: 11468284. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-024-01290-y.


The mutant mouse resource and research center (MMRRC) consortium: the US-based public mouse repository system.

Agca Y, Amos-Landgraf J, Araiza R, Brennan J, Carlson C, Ciavatta D Mamm Genome. 2024; 35(4):524-536.

PMID: 39304538 PMC: 11522152. DOI: 10.1007/s00335-024-10070-3.


A multi-center evaluation of a novel IVF cryostorage device in an active clinical setting.

Collins M, Bailey J, Tremont J, Laasch N, McDonough C, Dufault A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):18965.

PMID: 39152173 PMC: 11329509. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-69877-4.


Effect of microgravity on mammalian embryo development evaluated at the International Space Station.

Wakayama S, Kikuchi Y, Soejima M, Hayashi E, Ushigome N, Yamazaki C iScience. 2023; 26(11):108177.

PMID: 38107876 PMC: 10725056. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108177.


Development of a new device for manipulating frozen mouse 2-cell embryos on the International Space Station.

Wakayama S, Soejima M, Kikuchi Y, Hayashi E, Ushigome N, Hasegawa A PLoS One. 2022; 17(10):e0270781.

PMID: 36206235 PMC: 9543944. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270781.


References
1.
Jin B, Mochida K, Ogura A, Hotta E, Kobayashi Y, Ito K . Equilibrium vitrification of mouse embryos. Biol Reprod. 2009; 82(2):444-50. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.109.077685. View

2.
WHITTINGHAM D . Embryo banks in the future of developmental genetics. Genetics. 1974; 78(1):395-402. PMC: 1213199. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/78.1.395. View

3.
Yavin S, Arav A . Measurement of essential physical properties of vitrification solutions. Theriogenology. 2006; 67(1):81-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.09.029. View

4.
Martinez A, Matkovic M . Cryopreservation of ovine embryos: slow freezing and vitrification. Theriogenology. 2000; 49(5):1039-49. DOI: 10.1016/s0093-691x(98)00052-1. View

5.
Valdez C, Abas Mazni O, Takahashi Y, Fujikawa S, Kanagawa H . Successful cryopreservation of mouse blastocysts using a new vitrification solution. J Reprod Fertil. 1992; 96(2):793-802. DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0960793. View