» Articles » PMID: 23283225

A Cell-level Biomechanical Model of Drosophila Dorsal Closure

Overview
Journal Biophys J
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2013 Jan 4
PMID 23283225
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We report a model describing the various stages of dorsal closure of Drosophila. Inspired by experimental observations, we represent the amnioserosa by 81 hexagonal cells that are coupled mechanically through the position of the nodes and the elastic forces on the edges. In addition, each cell has radial spokes representing actin filaments on which myosin motors can attach and exert contractile forces on the nodes, the attachment being controlled by a signaling molecule. Thus, the model couples dissipative cell and tissue motion with kinetic equations describing the myosin and signal dynamics. In the early phase, amnioserosa cells oscillate as a result of coupling among the chemical signaling, myosin attachment/detachment, and mechanical deformation of neighboring cells. In the slow phase, we test two ratcheting mechanisms suggested by experiments: an internal ratchet by the apical and junctional myosin condensates, and an external one by the supracellular actin cables encircling the amnioserosa. Within the range of parameters tested, the model predictions suggest the former as the main contributor to cell and tissue area reduction in this stage. In the fast phase of dorsal closure, cell pulsation is arrested, and the cell and tissue areas contract consistently. This is realized in the model by gradually shrinking the resting length of the spokes. Overall, the model captures the key features of dorsal closure through the three distinct phases, and its predictions are in good agreement with observations.

Citing Articles

Generating active T1 transitions through mechanochemical feedback.

Sknepnek R, Djafer-Cherif I, Chuai M, Weijer C, Henkes S Elife. 2023; 12.

PMID: 37039463 PMC: 10156166. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.79862.


Powering morphogenesis: multiscale challenges at the interface of cell adhesion and the cytoskeleton.

Fernandez-Gonzalez R, Peifer M Mol Biol Cell. 2022; 33(8).

PMID: 35696393 PMC: 9635287. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E21-09-0452.


A Chemomechanical Model for Regulation of Contractility in the Embryonic Brain Tube.

Oltean A, Taber L J Elast. 2022; 145(1-2):77-98.

PMID: 35400797 PMC: 8993162. DOI: 10.1007/s10659-020-09811-7.


Elongated Cells Drive Morphogenesis in a Surface-Wrapped Finite-Element Model of Germband Retraction.

McCleery W, Veldhuis J, Bennett M, Lynch H, Ma X, Brodland G Biophys J. 2019; 117(1):157-169.

PMID: 31229244 PMC: 6626845. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.05.023.


Dynamics of PAR Proteins Explain the Oscillation and Ratcheting Mechanisms in Dorsal Closure.

Durney C, Harris T, Feng J Biophys J. 2018; 115(11):2230-2241.

PMID: 30446158 PMC: 6289075. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.10.014.


References
1.
Solon J, Kaya-Copur A, Colombelli J, Brunner D . Pulsed forces timed by a ratchet-like mechanism drive directed tissue movement during dorsal closure. Cell. 2009; 137(7):1331-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.050. View

2.
MacKintosh F, Levine A . Nonequilibrium mechanics and dynamics of motor-activated gels. Phys Rev Lett. 2008; 100(1):018104. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.018104. View

3.
Kovacs M, Thirumurugan K, Knight P, Sellers J . Load-dependent mechanism of nonmuscle myosin 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(24):9994-9. PMC: 1885822. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0701181104. View

4.
Franke J, Montague R, Kiehart D . Nonmuscle myosin II generates forces that transmit tension and drive contraction in multiple tissues during dorsal closure. Curr Biol. 2005; 15(24):2208-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.11.064. View

5.
Martin A, Kaschube M, Wieschaus E . Pulsed contractions of an actin-myosin network drive apical constriction. Nature. 2008; 457(7228):495-9. PMC: 2822715. DOI: 10.1038/nature07522. View