» Articles » PMID: 27749821

Amnioserosa Cell Constriction but Not Epidermal Actin Cable Tension Autonomously Drives Dorsal Closure

Overview
Journal Nat Cell Biol
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 2016 Oct 28
PMID 27749821
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Tissue morphogenesis requires coordination of multiple force-producing components. During dorsal closure in fly embryogenesis, an epidermis opening closes. A tensioned epidermal actin/MyosinII cable, which surrounds the opening, produces a force that is thought to combine with another MyosinII force mediating apical constriction of the amnioserosa cells that fill the opening. A model proposing that each force could autonomously drive dorsal closure was recently challenged by a model in which the two forces combine in a ratchet mechanism. Acute force elimination via selective MyosinII depletion in one or the other tissue shows that the amnioserosa tissue autonomously drives dorsal closure while the actin/MyosinII cable cannot. These findings exclude both previous models, although a contribution of the ratchet mechanism at dorsal closure onset remains likely. This shifts the current view of dorsal closure being a combinatorial force-component system to a single tissue-driven closure event.

Citing Articles

Dynamic interplay of microtubule and actomyosin forces drive tissue extension.

Singh A, Thale S, Leibner T, Lamparter L, Ricker A, Nusse H Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):3198.

PMID: 38609383 PMC: 11014958. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-47596-8.


Elimination of aberrantly specified cell clones is independent of interfacial Myosin II accumulation.

Klipa O, El Gammal M, Hamaratoglu F J Cell Sci. 2023; 136(13).

PMID: 37309190 PMC: 10357031. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.259935.


How dynamic prestress governs the shape of living systems, from the subcellular to tissue scale.

Erlich A, Etienne J, Fouchard J, Wyatt T Interface Focus. 2022; 12(6):20220038.

PMID: 36330322 PMC: 9560792. DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2022.0038.


Septate junction proteins are required for cell shape changes, actomyosin reorganization and cell adhesion during dorsal closure in .

De O, Rice C, Zulueta-Coarasa T, Fernandez-Gonzalez R, Ward 4th R Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022; 10:947444.

PMID: 36238688 PMC: 9553006. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.947444.


Engineered kinases as a tool for phosphorylation of selected targets in vivo.

Lepeta K, Roubinet C, Bauer M, Vigano M, Aguilar G, Kanca O J Cell Biol. 2022; 221(10).

PMID: 36102907 PMC: 9477969. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.202106179.


References
1.
Brand A, Perrimon N . Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development. 1993; 118(2):401-15. DOI: 10.1242/dev.118.2.401. View

2.
Gorfinkiel N, Blanchard G, Adams R, Martinez Arias A . Mechanical control of global cell behaviour during dorsal closure in Drosophila. Development. 2009; 136(11):1889-98. PMC: 2680111. DOI: 10.1242/dev.030866. View

3.
Chatterjee N, Bohmann D . A versatile ΦC31 based reporter system for measuring AP-1 and Nrf2 signaling in Drosophila and in tissue culture. PLoS One. 2012; 7(4):e34063. PMC: 3324472. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034063. View

4.
Jayasinghe A, Crews S, Mashburn D, Hutson M . Apical oscillations in amnioserosa cells: basolateral coupling and mechanical autonomy. Biophys J. 2013; 105(1):255-65. PMC: 3699749. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.05.027. View

5.
David D, Tishkina A, Harris T . The PAR complex regulates pulsed actomyosin contractions during amnioserosa apical constriction in Drosophila. Development. 2010; 137(10):1645-55. DOI: 10.1242/dev.044107. View