» Articles » PMID: 23275041

Effect of Timing of Surgery on Neurological Outcome and Survival in Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression

Overview
Journal Eur Spine J
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2013 Jan 1
PMID 23275041
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) requires expeditious treatment. While there is no ambiguity in the literature about the urgency of care for patients with MSCC, the effect of timing of surgical intervention has not been investigated in detail. The objective of our study was to investigate whether or not the 'timing of surgery' is an important factor in survival and neurological outcome in patients with MSCC.

Methods: All patients with MSCC presenting to our unit from October 2005 to March 2010 were included in this study. Patients were divided into three groups-those who underwent surgery within 24 h (Group 1, n = 45), between 24 and 48 h (Group 2, n = 23) and after 48 h (Group 3, n = 53) from acute presentation of neurological symptoms. The outcome measures studied were neurological outcome (change in Frankel grade post-operatively), survival (survival rate and median survival in days), incidence of infection, length of stay and complications.

Results: Patients' age, gender, revised Tokuhashi score, level of spinal metastasis and primary tumour type were not significantly different between the three groups. Greatest improvement in neurology was observed in Group 1, although not significantly when compared against Group 2 (24-48 h; (p = 0.09). When comparisons of neurological outcome were performed for all patients having surgery within 48 h (Groups 1 and 2) versus after 48 h (Group 3), the Frankel grade improvement was significant (p = 0.048) favouring surgery within 48 h of presentation. There was a negative correlation (-0.17) between the delay in surgery and the immediate neurological improvement, suggesting less improvement in those who had delayed surgery. There was no difference in length of hospital stay, incidence of infection, post-operative complications or survival between the groups.

Conclusions: Our results show that surgery should be performed sooner rather than later. Furthermore, earlier surgical treatment within 48 h in patients with MSCC resulted in significantly better neurological outcome. However, the timing of surgery did not influence length of hospital stay, complication rate or patient survival.

Citing Articles

Development of a natural language processing algorithm for the detection of spinal metastasis based on magnetic resonance imaging reports.

Mostafa E, Hui A, Aasman B, Chowdary K, Mani K, Mardakhaev E N Am Spine Soc J. 2024; 19:100513.

PMID: 39149563 PMC: 11325227. DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100513.


The Recovered Independent Ambulation Rate and Prognostic Factors of Non-ambulatory Patients After Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression Surgery.

Iida K, Sugita T, Fujiwara T, Saiwai H Cureus. 2024; 16(7):e64458.

PMID: 39135836 PMC: 11318365. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.64458.


Comprehensive Insights into Metastasis-Associated Spinal Cord Compression: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis: A State-of-the-Art Systematic Review.

Vavourakis M, Sakellariou E, Galanis A, Karampinas P, Zachariou D, Tsalimas G J Clin Med. 2024; 13(12).

PMID: 38930119 PMC: 11205147. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13123590.


Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Optimal Timing of Surgery for Acute Symptomatic Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression.

Bresolin N, Sartori L, Drago G, Pastorello G, Gallinaro P, Del Verme J Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(4).

PMID: 38674277 PMC: 11052148. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60040631.


Post-operative complications affect survival in surgically treated metastatic spinal cord compression.

Gonzalez-Kusjanovic N, Delgado Ochoa B, Vidal C, Campos M Int Orthop. 2024; 48(5):1341-1350.

PMID: 38472466 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-024-06120-9.


References
1.
Tancioni F, Navarria P, Pessina F, Attuati L, Mancosu P, Alloisio M . Assessment of prognostic factors in patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) from solid tumor after surgery plus radiotherapy: a single institution experience. Eur Spine J. 2012; 21 Suppl 1:S146-8. PMC: 3325389. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2232-0. View

2.
Bucholtz J . Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression. Semin Oncol Nurs. 1999; 15(3):150-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-2081(99)80002-3. View

3.
Furstenberg C, Wiedenhofer B, Gerner H, Putz C . The effect of early surgical treatment on recovery in patients with metastatic compression of the spinal cord. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009; 91(2):240-4. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B2.20894. View

4.
Patchell R, Tibbs P, Regine W, Payne R, Saris S, Kryscio R . Direct decompressive surgical resection in the treatment of spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2005; 366(9486):643-8. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66954-1. View

5.
Gilbert R, Kim J, Posner J . Epidural spinal cord compression from metastatic tumor: diagnosis and treatment. Ann Neurol. 1978; 3(1):40-51. DOI: 10.1002/ana.410030107. View