» Articles » PMID: 23274105

In vivo Comparison of Delayed Gadolinium-enhanced MRI of Cartilage and Delayed Quantitative CT Arthrography in Imaging of Articular Cartilage

Overview
Date 2013 Jan 1
PMID 23274105
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of cartilage (dGEMRIC) and delayed quantitative computed tomography (CT) arthrography (dQCTA) to each other, and their association to arthroscopy. Additionally, the relationship between dGEMRIC with intravenous (dGEMRIC(IV)) and intra-articular contrast agent administration (dGEMRIC(IA)) was determined.

Design: Eleven patients with knee pain were scanned at 3 T MRI and 64-slice CT before arthroscopy. dQCTA was performed at 5 and 45 min after intra-articular injection of ioxaglate. Both dGEMRIC(IV) and dGEMRIC(IA) were performed at 90 min after gadopentetate injection. dGEMRIC indices and change in relaxation rates (ΔR(1)) were separately calculated for dGEMRIC(IV) and dGEMRIC(IA). dGEMRIC and dQCTA parameters were calculated for predetermined sites at the knee joint that were International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) graded in arthroscopy.

Results: dQCTA normalized with the contrast agent concentration in synovial fluid (SF) and dGEMRIC(IV) correlated significantly, whereas dGEMRIC(IA) correlated with the normalized dQCTA only when dGEMRIC(IA) was also normalized with the contrast agent concentration in SF. Correlation was strongest between normalized dQCTA at 45 min and ΔR(1,IV) (r(s) = 0.72 [95% CI 0.56-0.83], n = 49, P < 0.01) and ΔR(1,IA) normalized with ΔR(1) in SF (r(s) = 0.70 [0.53-0.82], n = 52, P < 0.01). Neither dGEMRIC nor dQCTA correlated with arthroscopic grading. dGEMRIC(IV) and non-normalized dGEMRIC(IA) were not related while ΔR(1,IV) correlated with normalized ΔR(1,IA) (r(s) = 0.52 [0.28-0.70], n = 50, P < 0.01).

Conclusions: This study suggests that dQCTA is in best agreement with dGEMRIC(IV) at 45 min after CT contrast agent injection. dQCTA and dGEMRIC were not related to arthroscopy, probably because the remaining cartilage is analysed in dGEMRIC and dQCTA, whereas in arthroscopy the absence of cartilage defines the grading. The findings indicate the importance to take into account the contrast agent concentration in SF in dQCTA and dGEMRIC(IA).

Citing Articles

Validation of watershed-based segmentation of the cartilage surface from sequential CT arthrography scans.

Hall M, Black M, Gold G, Levenston M Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022; 12(1):1-14.

PMID: 34993056 PMC: 8666781. DOI: 10.21037/qims-20-1062.


Spectral CT imaging of human osteoarthritic cartilage via quantitative assessment of glycosaminoglycan content using multiple contrast agents.

Baer K, Kieser S, Schon B, Rajendran K, Ten Harkel T, Ramyar M APL Bioeng. 2021; 5(2):026101.

PMID: 33834156 PMC: 8018795. DOI: 10.1063/5.0035312.


Rapid CT-based Estimation of Articular Cartilage Biomechanics in the Knee Joint Without Cartilage Segmentation.

Mohammadi A, Myller K, Tanska P, Hirvasniemi J, Saarakkala S, Toyras J Ann Biomed Eng. 2020; 48(12):2965-2975.

PMID: 33179182 PMC: 7723937. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-020-02666-y.


Nanotechnological Strategies for Osteoarthritis Diagnosis, Monitoring, Clinical Management, and Regenerative Medicine: Recent Advances and Future Opportunities.

Mohammadinejad R, Ashrafizadeh M, Pardakhty A, Uzieliene I, Denkovskij J, Bernotiene E Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2020; 22(4):12.

PMID: 32248371 PMC: 7128005. DOI: 10.1007/s11926-020-0884-z.


Quantitative Knee Arthrography in a Large Animal Model of Osteoarthritis Using Photon-Counting Detector CT.

Rajendran K, Murthy N, Frick M, Tao S, Unger M, LaVallee K Invest Radiol. 2020; 55(6):349-356.

PMID: 31985604 PMC: 7212750. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000648.