» Articles » PMID: 23260052

The Effect of DNA CpG Methylation on the Dynamic Conformation of a Nucleosome

Overview
Journal Biophys J
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2012 Dec 25
PMID 23260052
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

DNA methylation is an important epigenetic mark that is known to induce chromatin condensation and gene silencing. We used a time-domain fluorescence lifetime measurement to quantify the effects of DNA hypermethylation on the conformation and dynamics of a nucleosome. Nucleosomes reconstituted on an unmethylated and a methylated DNA both exhibit dynamic conformations under physiological conditions. The DNA end breathing motion and the H2A-H2B dimer destabilization dominate the dynamic behavior of nucleosomes at low to medium ionic strength. Extensive DNA CpG methylation, surprisingly, does not help to restrain the DNA breathing motion, but facilitates the formation of a more open nucleosome conformation. The presence of the divalent cation, Mg(2+), essential for chromatin compaction, and the methyl donor molecule SAM, required for DNA methyltransferase reaction, facilitate the compaction of both types of nucleosomes. The difference between the unmethylated and the methylated nucleosome persists within a broad range of salt concentrations, but vanishes under high magnesium concentrations. Reduced DNA backbone rigidity due to the presence of methyl groups is believed to contribute to the observed structural and dynamic differences. The observation of this study suggests that DNA methylation alone does not compact chromatin at the nucleosomal level and provides molecular details to understand the regulatory role of DNA methylation in gene expression.

Citing Articles

Epigenetic Modifier Drug Valproic Acid Enhances Cancer Metaphase Chromosome Elasticity and Electron Transport: An Atomic Force Microscopy Approach.

Agrawal T, Paul D, Mishra A, Arunkumar G, Rakshit T JACS Au. 2025; 5(2):766-778.

PMID: 40017767 PMC: 11862959. DOI: 10.1021/jacsau.4c00991.


Fundamentals of DNA methylation in development.

Gillespie C, Chowdhury A, Quinn K, Jenkins M, Rollins A, Watanabe M Pediatr Res. 2024; .

PMID: 39658604 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-024-03674-7.


Impacts of Nucleosome Positioning Elements and Pre-Assembled Chromatin States on Expression and Retention of Transgenes.

Kwizera R, Xie J, Nurse N, Yuan C, Kirchmaier A Genes (Basel). 2024; 15(9).

PMID: 39336823 PMC: 11431089. DOI: 10.3390/genes15091232.


Studies of the Mechanism of Nucleosome Dynamics: A Review on Multifactorial Regulation from Computational and Experimental Cases.

Shi D, Huang Y, Bai C Polymers (Basel). 2023; 15(7).

PMID: 37050377 PMC: 10096840. DOI: 10.3390/polym15071763.


Epigenetics of Thymic Epithelial Tumors.

Nicoli V, Coppede F Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(2).

PMID: 36672310 PMC: 9856807. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020360.


References
1.
Chabbert M, Hillen W, Hansen D, Takahashi M, Bousquet J . Structural analysis of the operator binding domain of Tn10-encoded Tet repressor: a time-resolved fluorescence and anisotropy study. Biochemistry. 1992; 31(7):1951-60. DOI: 10.1021/bi00122a008. View

2.
Koopmans W, Buning R, Schmidt T, van Noort J . spFRET using alternating excitation and FCS reveals progressive DNA unwrapping in nucleosomes. Biophys J. 2009; 97(1):195-204. PMC: 2711358. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.04.030. View

3.
Nathan D, Crothers D . Bending and flexibility of methylated and unmethylated EcoRI DNA. J Mol Biol. 2002; 316(1):7-17. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5247. View

4.
Davey C, Pennings S, Reilly C, Meehan R, Allan J . A determining influence for CpG dinucleotides on nucleosome positioning in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004; 32(14):4322-31. PMC: 514372. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkh749. View

5.
Shlyakhtenko L, Lushnikov A, Lyubchenko Y . Dynamics of nucleosomes revealed by time-lapse atomic force microscopy. Biochemistry. 2009; 48(33):7842-8. PMC: 2752652. DOI: 10.1021/bi900977t. View