» Articles » PMID: 23255849

Acute and Long-term Angiographic Outcomes of Side Branch Stenosis After Randomized Treatment of Zotarolimus-, Sirolimus-, and Paclitaxel-eluting Stent for Coronary Artery Stenosis

Abstract

This was designed to assess the outcomes of side branch (SB) stenosis after implantation of three drug-eluting stents (DES). From 2,645 patients in the ZEST (Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent with Sirolimus-Eluting and PacliTaxel-Eluting Stent for Coronary Lesions) Trial, 788 patients had 923 bifurcation lesions with SB ≥ 1.5 mm were included. SB was treated in 150 lesions, including 35 (3.8%) receiving SB stenting. Of untreated SB with baseline stenosis < 50%, the incidences of periprocedural SB compromise was similar in the zotarolimus (15.8%), sirolimus (17.2%), and paclitaxel (16.6%) stent groups (P = 0.92). At follow-up angiography, delayed SB compromise occurred in 13.9%, 3.2%, and 9.4% (P = 0.010) of these groups. When classified into four groups (< 50%, 50%-70%, 70%-99%, and 100%), 9.0% of untreated SB were worsened, whereas improvement and stationary were observed in 9.6% and 81.4%. In a multivariable logistic regression model, main branch (MB) stenosis at follow-up (%) was the only independent predictor of SB stenosis worsening (odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.04; P < 0.001). After MB stenting in bifurcation lesions, a minority of SB appears to worsen. DES with strong anti-restenotic efficacy may help maintain SB patency.

Citing Articles

Relationship between neointimal strut bridge and jailed side-branch ostial area.

Wu X, You W, Wu Z, Ye F, Chen S Herz. 2019; 46(2):178-187.

PMID: 31555892 DOI: 10.1007/s00059-019-04856-4.


Serial changes in the three-dimensional aspect of the side-branch ostium jailed by a drug-eluting stent assessed by optical coherence tomography.

Nakamura T, Okamura T, Fujimura T, Yamada J, Nao T, Tateishi H Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017; 33(6):797-806.

PMID: 28168562 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-017-1080-8.

References
1.
Kim Y, Park D, Suh I, Jang J, Hwang E, Jeong Y . Long-term outcome of simultaneous kissing stenting technique with sirolimus-eluting stent for large bifurcation coronary lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007; 70(6):840-6. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.21254. View

2.
Kim Y, Park S, Hong M, Park D, Park K, Lee B . Comparison of simple and complex stenting techniques in the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery bifurcation stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2006; 97(11):1597-601. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.12.051. View

3.
Popma J, Leon M, Moses J, Holmes Jr D, Cox N, Fitzpatrick M . Quantitative assessment of angiographic restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in native coronary arteries. Circulation. 2004; 110(25):3773-80. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000150331.14687.4B. View

4.
Colombo A, Bramucci E, Sacca S, Violini R, Lettieri C, Zanini R . Randomized study of the crush technique versus provisional side-branch stenting in true coronary bifurcations: the CACTUS (Coronary Bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stents) Study. Circulation. 2008; 119(1):71-8. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.808402. View

5.
Goktekin O, Kaplan S, Dimopoulos K, Barlis P, Tanigawa J, Vatankulu M . A new quantitative analysis system for the evaluation of coronary bifurcation lesions: comparison with current conventional methods. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006; 69(2):172-80. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.20946. View