» Articles » PMID: 23254394

Low Diversity in the Mitogenome of Sperm Whales Revealed by Next-generation Sequencing

Overview
Date 2012 Dec 21
PMID 23254394
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Large population sizes and global distributions generally associate with high mitochondrial DNA control region (CR) diversity. The sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus) is an exception, showing low CR diversity relative to other cetaceans; however, diversity levels throughout the remainder of the sperm whale mitogenome are unknown. We sequenced 20 mitogenomes from 17 sperm whales representative of worldwide diversity using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies (Illumina GAIIx, Roche 454 GS Junior). Resequencing of three individuals with both NGS platforms and partial Sanger sequencing showed low discrepancy rates (454-Illumina: 0.0071%; Sanger-Illumina: 0.0034%; and Sanger-454: 0.0023%) confirming suitability of both NGS platforms for investigating low mitogenomic diversity. Using the 17 sperm whale mitogenomes in a phylogenetic reconstruction with 41 other species, including 11 new dolphin mitogenomes, we tested two hypotheses for the low CR diversity. First, the hypothesis that CR-specific constraints have reduced diversity solely in the CR was rejected as diversity was low throughout the mitogenome, not just in the CR (overall diversity π = 0.096%; protein-coding 3rd codon = 0.22%; CR = 0.35%), and CR phylogenetic signal was congruent with protein-coding regions. Second, the hypothesis that slow substitution rates reduced diversity throughout the sperm whale mitogenome was rejected as sperm whales had significantly higher rates of CR evolution and no evidence of slow coding region evolution relative to other cetaceans. The estimated time to most recent common ancestor for sperm whale mitogenomes was 72,800 to 137,400 years ago (95% highest probability density interval), consistent with previous hypotheses of a bottleneck or selective sweep as likely causes of low mitogenome diversity.

Citing Articles

The admixed brushtail possum genome reveals invasion history in New Zealand and novel imprinted genes.

Bond D, Ortega-Recalde O, Laird M, Hayakawa T, Richardson K, Reese F Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):6364.

PMID: 37848431 PMC: 10582058. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-41784-8.


mtDNA heteroplasmy gives rise to a new maternal lineage in North Pacific humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae).

Pierszalowski S, Steel D, Gabriele C, Neilson J, Vanselow P, Cedarleaf J J Hered. 2022; 114(1):14-21.

PMID: 36146890 PMC: 10019026. DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esac042.


Breed-specific reference sequence optimized mapping accuracy of NGS analyses for pigs.

Wang D, Yang L, Ning C, Liu J, Zhao X BMC Genomics. 2021; 22(1):736.

PMID: 34641784 PMC: 8507312. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-021-08030-1.


Kin relationships in cultural species of the marine realm: case study of a matrilineal social group of sperm whales off Mauritius island, Indian Ocean.

Sarano F, Girardet J, Sarano V, Vitry H, Preudhomme A, Heuzey R R Soc Open Sci. 2021; 8(2):201794.

PMID: 33972866 PMC: 8074673. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.201794.


Kinship influences sperm whale social organization within, but generally not among, social units.

Konrad C, Gero S, Frasier T, Whitehead H R Soc Open Sci. 2018; 5(8):180914.

PMID: 30225081 PMC: 6124104. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.180914.


References
1.
Natoli A, Birkun A, Aguilar A, Lopez A, Hoelzel A . Habitat structure and the dispersal of male and female bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Proc Biol Sci. 2005; 272(1569):1217-26. PMC: 1564106. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3076. View

2.
Lyrholm T, Leimar O, Gyllensten U . Low diversity and biased substitution patterns in the mitochondrial DNA control region of sperm whales: implications for estimates of time since common ancestry. Mol Biol Evol. 1996; 13(10):1318-26. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025578. View

3.
Drummond A, Rambaut A . BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol Biol. 2007; 7:214. PMC: 2247476. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-214. View

4.
Stewart J, Freyer C, Elson J, Wredenberg A, Cansu Z, Trifunovic A . Strong purifying selection in transmission of mammalian mitochondrial DNA. PLoS Biol. 2008; 6(1):e10. PMC: 2214808. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060010. View

5.
Richly E, Leister D . NUMTs in sequenced eukaryotic genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 2004; 21(6):1081-4. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msh110. View