» Articles » PMID: 23251491

Genome-wide Analysis of DNA Methylation Differences in Muscle and Fat from Monozygotic Twins Discordant for Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract

Background: Monozygotic twins discordant for type 2 diabetes constitute an ideal model to study environmental contributions to type 2 diabetic traits. We aimed to examine whether global DNA methylation differences exist in major glucose metabolic tissues from these twins.

Methodology/principal Findings: Skeletal muscle (n = 11 pairs) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (n = 5 pairs) biopsies were collected from 53-80 year-old monozygotic twin pairs discordant for type 2 diabetes. DNA methylation was measured by microarrays at 26,850 cytosine-guanine dinucleotide (CpG) sites in the promoters of 14,279 genes. Bisulfite sequencing was applied to validate array data and to quantify methylation of intergenic repetitive DNA sequences. The overall intra-pair variation in DNA methylation was large in repetitive (LINE1, D4Z4 and NBL2) regions compared to gene promoters (standard deviation of intra-pair differences: 10% points vs. 4% points, P<0.001). Increased variation of LINE1 sequence methylation was associated with more phenotypic dissimilarity measured as body mass index (r = 0.77, P = 0.007) and 2-hour plasma glucose (r = 0.66, P = 0.03) whereas the variation in promoter methylation did not associate with phenotypic differences. Validated methylation changes were identified in the promoters of known type 2 diabetes-related genes, including PPARGC1A in muscle (13.9±6.2% vs. 9.0±4.5%, P = 0.03) and HNF4A in adipose tissue (75.2±3.8% vs. 70.5±3.7%, P<0.001) which had increased methylation in type 2 diabetic individuals. A hypothesis-free genome-wide exploration of differential methylation without correction for multiple testing identified 789 and 1,458 CpG sites in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue, respectively. These methylation changes only reached some percentage points, and few sites passed correction for multiple testing.

Conclusions/significance: Our study suggests that likely acquired DNA methylation changes in skeletal muscle or adipose tissue gene promoters are quantitatively small between type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic twins. The importance of methylation changes in candidate genes such as PPARGC1A and HNF4A should be examined further by replication in larger samples.

Citing Articles

Multiomics profiling of DNA methylation, microRNA, and mRNA in skeletal muscle from monozygotic twin pairs discordant for type 2 diabetes identifies dysregulated genes controlling metabolism.

Ling C, Vavakova M, Mir B, Sall J, Perfilyev A, Martin M BMC Med. 2024; 22(1):572.

PMID: 39623445 PMC: 11613913. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03789-y.


DNA methylation in human diseases.

Younesian S, Mohammadi M, Younesian O, Momeny M, Ghaffari S, Bashash D Heliyon. 2024; 10(11):e32366.

PMID: 38933971 PMC: 11200359. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32366.


Deciphering the complex interplay of risk factors in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A comprehensive review.

Singh S, Kriti M, K S A, Sarma D, Verma V, Nagpal R Metabol Open. 2024; 22():100287.

PMID: 38818227 PMC: 11137529. DOI: 10.1016/j.metop.2024.100287.


DNA methylation and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.

Nadiger N, Veed J, Chinya Nataraj P, Mukhopadhyay A Clin Epigenetics. 2024; 16(1):67.

PMID: 38755631 PMC: 11100087. DOI: 10.1186/s13148-024-01670-6.


Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator-1 (PGC-1) family in physiological and pathophysiological process and diseases.

Qian L, Zhu Y, Deng C, Liang Z, Chen J, Chen Y Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024; 9(1):50.

PMID: 38424050 PMC: 10904817. DOI: 10.1038/s41392-024-01756-w.


References
1.
Heijmans B, Tobi E, Stein A, Putter H, Blauw G, Susser E . Persistent epigenetic differences associated with prenatal exposure to famine in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(44):17046-9. PMC: 2579375. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0806560105. View

2.
Calvanese V, Lara E, Kahn A, Fraga M . The role of epigenetics in aging and age-related diseases. Ageing Res Rev. 2009; 8(4):268-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2009.03.004. View

3.
Cheung P, Allis C, Sassone-Corsi P . Signaling to chromatin through histone modifications. Cell. 2000; 103(2):263-71. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00118-5. View

4.
Fink R, Kolterman O, Griffin J, Olefsky J . Mechanisms of insulin resistance in aging. J Clin Invest. 1983; 71(6):1523-35. PMC: 370358. DOI: 10.1172/jci110908. View

5.
Dupuis J, Langenberg C, Prokopenko I, Saxena R, Soranzo N, Jackson A . New genetic loci implicated in fasting glucose homeostasis and their impact on type 2 diabetes risk. Nat Genet. 2010; 42(2):105-16. PMC: 3018764. DOI: 10.1038/ng.520. View