» Articles » PMID: 23233722

Single-sided Deafness Leads to Unilateral Aural Preference Within an Early Sensitive Period

Overview
Journal Brain
Specialty Neurology
Date 2012 Dec 13
PMID 23233722
Citations 77
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unilateral deafness has a high incidence in children. In addition to children who are born without hearing in one ear, children with bilateral deafness are frequently equipped only with one cochlear implant, leaving the other ear deaf. The present study investigates the effects of such single-sided deafness during development in the congenitally deaf cat. The investigated animals were either born with unilateral deafness or received a cochlear implant in one ear and were subjected to chronic monaural stimulation. In chronically stimulated animals, implantation ages were at the following three critical developmental points: 'early' during the peak of functional cortical synaptogenesis in deaf animals; 'intermediate' at the age when synaptic activity in the deaf cats dropped to the level of hearing control cats and finally, 'late' at the age when the evoked synaptic activity fell below the level of hearing control cats. After periods of unilateral hearing, local field potentials were recorded from the cortical surface using a microelectrode at ∼100 recording positions. Stimulation was with cochlear implants at both ears. The measures evaluated were dependent only on the symmetry of aural input: paired differences of onset latencies and paired relations of peak amplitudes of local field potentials. A massive reorganization of aural preference in favour of the hearing ear was found in these measures if the onset of unilateral hearing was early (before or around the peak of functional synaptogenesis). The effect was reduced if onset of unilateral hearing was in the intermediate period, and it disappeared if the onset was late. In early onset of unilateral deafness, the used ear became functionally dominant with respect to local field potential onset latency and amplitude. This explains the inferior outcome of implantations at the second-implanted ear compared with first-implanted ear in children. However, despite a central disadvantage for the deaf ear, it still remained capable of activating the auditory cortex. Appropriate training may thus help to improve the performance at the second-implanted ear. In conclusion, periods of monaural stimulation should be kept as short as possible, and training focused on the deaf ear should be introduced after delayed second implantation in children.

Citing Articles

Cortical mechanisms of across-ear speech integration investigated using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).

Sobczak G, Zhou X, Moore L, Bolt D, Litovsky R PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0307158.

PMID: 39292701 PMC: 11410267. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307158.


Bidirectional remodeling of the central auditory system caused by unilateral auditory deprivation.

Ge X, Xu C, Dai J, Zhou M, Liu J, Wang N Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1414738.

PMID: 39081341 PMC: 11286559. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1414738.


Dissociated Representation of Binaural Cues in Single-Sided Deafness: Implications for Cochlear Implantation.

Hubka P, Schmidt L, Tillein J, Baumhoff P, Konerding W, Land R J Neurosci. 2024; 44(28.

PMID: 38830759 PMC: 11236580. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1653-23.2024.


Review of Binaural Processing With Asymmetrical Hearing Outcomes in Patients With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Anderson S, Burg E, Suveg L, Litovsky R Trends Hear. 2024; 28:23312165241229880.

PMID: 38545645 PMC: 10976506. DOI: 10.1177/23312165241229880.


Mapping the unique neural engagement in deaf individuals during picture, word, and sign language processing: fMRI study.

Kumar U, Dhanik K, Mishra M, Pandey H, Keshri A Brain Imaging Behav. 2024; 18(4):835-851.

PMID: 38523177 DOI: 10.1007/s11682-024-00878-7.