» Articles » PMID: 36864095

A Cortical Biomarker of Audibility and Processing Efficacy in Children with Single-sided Deafness Using a Cochlear Implant

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2023 Mar 2
PMID 36864095
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The goals of the current study were to evaluate audibility and cortical speech processing, and to provide insight into binaural processing in children with single-sided deafness (CHwSSD) using a cochlear implant (CI). The P1 potential to acoustically-presented speech stimuli (/m/, /g/, /t/) was recorded during monaural [Normal hearing (NH), CI], and bilateral (BIL, NH + CI) listening conditions within a clinical setting in 22 CHwSSD (mean age at CI/testing 4.7, 5.7 years). Robust P1 potentials were elicited in all children in the NH and BIL conditions. In the CI condition: (1) P1 prevalence was reduced yet was elicited in all but one child to at least one stimulus; (2) P1 latency was prolonged and amplitude was reduced, consequently leading to absence of binaural processing manifestations; (3) Correlation between P1 latency and age at CI/testing was weak and not significant; (4) P1 prevalence for /m/ was reduced and associated with CI manufacturer and duration of CI use. Results indicate that recording CAEPs to speech stimuli in clinical settings is feasible and valuable for the management of CHwSSD. While CAEPs provided evidence for effective audibility, a substantial mismatch in timing and synchrony of early-stage cortical processing between the CI and NH ear remains a barrier for the development of binaural interaction components.

Citing Articles

Cochlear implantation in adults with acquired single-sided deafness improves cortical processing and comprehension of speech presented to the non-implanted ears: a longitudinal EEG study.

Chen Y, Neff P, Leske S, Wong D, Peter N, Obleser J Brain Commun. 2025; 7(1):fcaf001.

PMID: 39816191 PMC: 11733687. DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf001.


Brazilian Society of Otology task force - single sided deafness - recommendations based on strength of evidence.

Tsuji R, Hamerschmidt R, Lavinsky J, Felix F, Silva V Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 91(1):101514.

PMID: 39378663 PMC: 11492085. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2024.101514.


Single-Sided Deafness and Hearing Rehabilitation Modalities: Contralateral Routing of Signal Devices, Bone Conduction Devices, and Cochlear Implants.

Pantaleo A, Murri A, Cavallaro G, Pontillo V, Auricchio D, Quaranta N Brain Sci. 2024; 14(1).

PMID: 38275519 PMC: 10814000. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14010099.


Cochlear Implantation in Children Affected by Single-Sided Deafness: A Comprehensive Review.

Santopietro G, Fancello V, Fancello G, Bianchini C, Pelucchi S, Ciorba A Audiol Res. 2024; 14(1):77-85.

PMID: 38247563 PMC: 10801602. DOI: 10.3390/audiolres14010007.

References
1.
Tavora-Vieira D, Wedekind A, Marino R, Purdy S, Rajan G . Using aided cortical assessment as an objective tool to evaluate cochlear implant fitting in users with single-sided deafness. PLoS One. 2018; 13(2):e0193081. PMC: 5823436. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193081. View

2.
Kral A . Auditory critical periods: a review from system's perspective. Neuroscience. 2013; 247:117-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.05.021. View

3.
Sharma A, Dorman M, Spahr A . A sensitive period for the development of the central auditory system in children with cochlear implants: implications for age of implantation. Ear Hear. 2002; 23(6):532-9. DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200212000-00004. View

4.
Wunderlich J, Cone-Wesson B . Maturation of CAEP in infants and children: a review. Hear Res. 2006; 212(1-2):212-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2005.11.008. View

5.
Carter L, Golding M, Dillon H, Seymour J . The detection of infant cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) using statistical and visual detection techniques. J Am Acad Audiol. 2010; 21(5):347-56. DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.21.5.6. View