Does an Oblique/slanted Perspective During Virtual Navigation Engage Both Egocentric and Allocentric Brain Strategies?
Overview
Affiliations
Perspective (route or survey) during the encoding of spatial information can influence recall and navigation performance. In our experiment we investigated a third type of perspective, which is a slanted view. This slanted perspective is a compromise between route and survey perspectives, offering both information about landmarks as in route perspective and geometric information as in survey perspective. We hypothesized that the use of slanted perspective would allow the brain to use either egocentric or allocentric strategies during storage and recall. Twenty-six subjects were scanned (3-Tesla fMRI) during the encoding of a path (40-s navigation movie within a virtual city). They were given the task of encoding a segment of travel in the virtual city and of subsequent shortcut-finding for each perspective: route, slanted and survey. The analysis of the behavioral data revealed that perspective influenced response accuracy, with significantly more correct responses for slanted and survey perspectives than for route perspective. Comparisons of brain activation with route, slanted, and survey perspectives suggested that slanted and survey perspectives share common brain activity in the left lingual and fusiform gyri and lead to very similar behavioral performance. Slanted perspective was also associated with similar activation to route perspective during encoding in the right middle occipital gyrus. Furthermore, slanted perspective induced intermediate patterns of activation (in between route and survey) in some brain areas, such as the right lingual and fusiform gyri. Our results suggest that the slanted perspective may be considered as a hybrid perspective. This result offers the first empirical support for the choice to present the slanted perspective in many navigational aids.
Sense of self impacts spatial navigation and hexadirectional coding in human entorhinal cortex.
Moon H, Gauthier B, Park H, Faivre N, Blanke O Commun Biol. 2022; 5(1):406.
PMID: 35501331 PMC: 9061856. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-03361-5.
Agathos C, Ramanoel S, Becu M, Bernardin D, Habas C, Arleo A Front Aging Neurosci. 2020; 12:588653.
PMID: 33281600 PMC: 7689348. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.588653.
Exploring the Effects of Geographic Scale on Spatial Learning.
Zhao J, Simpson M, Wallgrun J, Sajjadi P, Klippel A Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020; 5(1):14.
PMID: 32249331 PMC: 7131976. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-020-00214-9.
Functional Neuroanatomy of Vertical Visual Perception in Humans.
Saj A, Borel L, Honore J Front Neurol. 2019; 10:142.
PMID: 30863358 PMC: 6400097. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00142.
Jebara N, Orriols E, Zaoui M, Berthoz A, Piolino P Front Aging Neurosci. 2015; 6:338.
PMID: 25566069 PMC: 4269133. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00338.