» Articles » PMID: 11923436

Neural Correlates of Encoding Space from Route and Survey Perspectives

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2002 Mar 30
PMID 11923436
Citations 66
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The neural mechanisms underlying ground-level spatial navigation have been investigated, but little is known about other kinds of spatial navigation. Functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to identify differences in brain activation for two types of spatial information, information from the ground-level perspective (route) and information from a global perspective (survey). Participants were scanned during the encoding of two different virtual reality environments, one from each perspective. Comparisons of brain activation during route and survey encoding suggested that both types of information recruited a common network of brain areas, but with important differences. Survey encoding recruited a subset of areas recruited by route encoding, but with greater activation in some areas, including inferior temporal cortex and posterior superior parietal cortex. Route encoding, in contrast, recruited regions that were not activated by survey encoding, including medial temporal lobe structures, anterior superior parietal cortex, and postcentral gyrus. These differences in brain activation are associated with differences in memory performance for the two types of spatial information and contribute to specification of brain components of spatial knowledge.

Citing Articles

Training system for converting current visual information to bird's-eye view.

Sumi K, Okuyama R Front Psychol. 2025; 15:1504838.

PMID: 39764080 PMC: 11701979. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1504838.


Imagery and Verbal Strategies in Spatial Memory for Route and Survey Descriptions.

Markostamou I, Morrissey S, Hornberger M Brain Sci. 2024; 14(4).

PMID: 38672053 PMC: 11048460. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14040403.


How three-dimensional sketching environments affect spatial thinking: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of virtual reality.

Tung Y, Chang C PLoS One. 2024; 19(3):e0294451.

PMID: 38466671 PMC: 10927127. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294451.


Bilingual Spatial Cognition: Spatial Cue Use in Bilinguals and Monolinguals.

Tyborowska A, Wegman J, Janzen G Brain Sci. 2024; 14(2).

PMID: 38391709 PMC: 10887090. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14020134.


Improved Spatial Knowledge Acquisition through Sensory Augmentation.

Schmidt V, Konig S, Dilawar R, Sanchez Pacheco T, Konig P Brain Sci. 2023; 13(5).

PMID: 37239192 PMC: 10216147. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13050720.


References
1.
Rolls E . Spatial view cells and the representation of place in the primate hippocampus. Hippocampus. 1999; 9(4):467-80. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(1999)9:4<467::AID-HIPO13>3.0.CO;2-F. View

2.
Aguirre G, DEsposito M . Environmental knowledge is subserved by separable dorsal/ventral neural areas. J Neurosci. 1997; 17(7):2512-8. PMC: 6573507. View

3.
Wood E, Dudchenko P, Eichenbaum H . The global record of memory in hippocampal neuronal activity. Nature. 1999; 397(6720):613-6. DOI: 10.1038/17605. View

4.
Tanaka K, Saito H, Fukada Y, Moriya M . Coding visual images of objects in the inferotemporal cortex of the macaque monkey. J Neurophysiol. 1991; 66(1):170-89. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1991.66.1.170. View

5.
Mellet E, Briscogne S, Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Ghaem O, Petit L, Zago L . Neural correlates of topographic mental exploration: the impact of route versus survey perspective learning. Neuroimage. 2000; 12(5):588-600. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0648. View