» Articles » PMID: 23197983

A Pilot Study on Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in Children: Aided CAEPs Reflect Improved High-Frequency Audibility with Frequency Compression Hearing Aid Technology

Overview
Date 2012 Dec 1
PMID 23197983
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background. This study investigated whether cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) could reliably be recorded and interpreted using clinical testing equipment, to assess the effects of hearing aid technology on the CAEP. Methods. Fifteen normal hearing (NH) and five hearing impaired (HI) children were included in the study. NH children were tested unaided; HI children were tested while wearing hearing aids. CAEPs were evoked with tone bursts presented at a suprathreshold level. Presence/absence of CAEPs was established based on agreement between two independent raters. Results. Present waveforms were interpreted for most NH listeners and all HI listeners, when stimuli were measured to be at an audible level. The younger NH children were found to have significantly different waveform morphology, compared to the older children, with grand averaged waveforms differing in the later part of the time window (the N2 response). Results suggest that in some children, frequency compression hearing aid processing improved audibility of specific frequencies, leading to increased rates of detectable cortical responses in HI children. Conclusions. These findings provide support for the use of CAEPs in measuring hearing aid benefit. Further research is needed to validate aided results across a larger group of HI participants and with speech-based stimuli.

Citing Articles

Investigating the effect of cochlear implant usage metrics on cortical auditory-evoked potential responses in adult recipients post-implantation.

Bogdanov C, Goulios H, Mulders W, Tavora-Vieira D Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1453274.

PMID: 39640296 PMC: 11619141. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1453274.


Direct Elicitation of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials by Electrical Stimulation and Their Use to Verify the Most Comfortable Level of Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Users.

Tavora-Vieira D, Ffoulkes E Audiol Neurootol. 2023; 28(4):294-307.

PMID: 36958296 PMC: 10407833. DOI: 10.1159/000529797.


Predicting Hearing aid Benefit Using Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses in Children With Hearing Loss.

Easwar V, Purcell D, Wright T Trends Hear. 2023; 27:23312165231151468.

PMID: 36946195 PMC: 10034298. DOI: 10.1177/23312165231151468.


Cortical auditory evoked potential in cochlear implant users: An objective method to improve speech perception.

Tavora-Vieira D, Wedekind A, Ffoulkes E, Voola M, Marino R PLoS One. 2022; 17(10):e0274643.

PMID: 36206248 PMC: 9543874. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274643.


Short-Term Test-Retest Reliability of Electrically Evoked Cortical Auditory Potentials in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Pike M, Biagio-de Jager L, le Roux T, Hofmeyr L Front Neurol. 2020; 11:305.

PMID: 32411080 PMC: 7198904. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00305.


References
1.
Simpson A, Hersbach A, McDermott H . Frequency-compression outcomes in listeners with steeply sloping audiograms. Int J Audiol. 2006; 45(11):619-29. DOI: 10.1080/14992020600825508. View

2.
Bagatto M, Moodie S, Scollie S, Seewald R, Moodie S, Pumford J . Clinical protocols for hearing instrument fitting in the Desired Sensation Level method. Trends Amplif. 2006; 9(4):199-226. PMC: 4111495. DOI: 10.1177/108471380500900404. View

3.
Scollie S, Seewald R, Cornelisse L, Moodie S, Bagatto M, Laurnagaray D . The Desired Sensation Level multistage input/output algorithm. Trends Amplif. 2006; 9(4):159-97. PMC: 4111494. DOI: 10.1177/108471380500900403. View

4.
Billings C, Tremblay K, Stecker G, Tolin W . Human evoked cortical activity to signal-to-noise ratio and absolute signal level. Hear Res. 2009; 254(1-2):15-24. PMC: 2732364. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.04.002. View

5.
Fox A, Anderson M, Reid C, Smith T, Bishop D . Maturation of auditory temporal integration and inhibition assessed with event-related potentials (ERPs). BMC Neurosci. 2010; 11:49. PMC: 2868034. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-11-49. View