» Articles » PMID: 23182509

Cost-effectiveness of CT Colonography

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2012 Nov 28
PMID 23182509
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Simulation modeling is extensively applied to CT colonography (CTC) to define its long-term efficacy and cost-effectiveness for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. CTC is effective in reducing CRC incidence and mortality (40%-77% and 58%-84%, respectively). Several factors may explain this variability. CTC is cost-effective compared with no screening, indicating that it represents an attractive test noncompliance with the available options. CTC needs to achieve a higher attendance rate or cost less than colonoscopy to be cost-effective relative to colonoscopy. Fortunately, both conditions appear to be achievable if CTC becomes a widely utilized and reimbursed screening tool.

Citing Articles

Colorectal cancer screening: A review of current knowledge and progress in research.

Lopes S, Martins C, Santos I, Teixeira M, Gamito E, Alves A World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024; 16(4):1119-1133.

PMID: 38660635 PMC: 11037045. DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i4.1119.


An AI-Based Colonic Polyp Classifier for Colorectal Cancer Screening Using Low-Dose Abdominal CT.

Alkabbany I, Ali A, Mohamed M, Elshazly S, Farag A Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(24).

PMID: 36560132 PMC: 9782078. DOI: 10.3390/s22249761.


Single CT Appointment for Double Lung and Colorectal Cancer Screening: Is the Time Ripe?.

Mascalchi M, Picozzi G, Puliti D, Gorini G, Mantellini P, Sali L Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(10).

PMID: 36292015 PMC: 9601268. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12102326.


Computed tomography colonography versus colonoscopy for detection of colorectal cancer: a diagnostic performance study.

Sha J, Chen J, Lv X, Liu S, Chen R, Zhang Z BMC Med Imaging. 2020; 20(1):51.

PMID: 32423413 PMC: 7236500. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-020-00446-7.


Colon cancer screening with CT colonography: logistics, cost-effectiveness, efficiency and progress.

Obaro A, Burling D, Plumb A Br J Radiol. 2018; 91(1090):20180307.

PMID: 29927637 PMC: 6350489. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180307.


References
1.
Hassan C, Hunink M, Laghi A, Pickhardt P, Zullo A, Kim D . Value-of-information analysis to guide future research in colorectal cancer screening. Radiology. 2009; 253(3):745-52. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2533090234. View

2.
Ladabaum U, Song K, Fendrick A . Colorectal neoplasia screening with virtual colonoscopy: when, at what cost, and with what national impact?. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004; 2(7):554-63. DOI: 10.1016/s1542-3565(04)00247-2. View

3.
Khan K, Xiong T, McCafferty I, Riley P, Ismail T, Lilford R . Frequency and impact of extracolonic findings detected at computed tomographic colonography in a symptomatic population. Br J Surg. 2007; 94(3):355-61. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5498. View

4.
Hassan C, Pickhardt P, Pickhardt P, Laghi A, Kim D, Kim D . Computed tomographic colonography to screen for colorectal cancer, extracolonic cancer, and aortic aneurysm: model simulation with cost-effectiveness analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2008; 168(7):696-705. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.168.7.696. View

5.
Tengs T, Wallace A . One thousand health-related quality-of-life estimates. Med Care. 2000; 38(6):583-637. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200006000-00004. View