TIGRESS: Trustful Inference of Gene REgulation Using Stability Selection

Overview

Journal BMC Syst Biol

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Biology

Date 2012 Nov 24

PMID 23173819

Citations 172

Authors

Anne-Claire Haury

Fantine Mordelet

Paola Vera-Licona

Jean-Philippe Vert

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Inferring the structure of gene regulatory networks (GRN) from a collection of gene expression data has many potential applications, from the elucidation of complex biological processes to the identification of potential drug targets. It is however a notoriously difficult problem, for which the many existing methods reach limited accuracy.

Results: In this paper, we formulate GRN inference as a sparse regression problem and investigate the performance of a popular feature selection method, least angle regression (LARS) combined with stability selection, for that purpose. We introduce a novel, robust and accurate scoring technique for stability selection, which improves the performance of feature selection with LARS. The resulting method, which we call TIGRESS (for Trustful Inference of Gene REgulation with Stability Selection), was ranked among the top GRN inference methods in the DREAM5 gene network inference challenge. In particular, TIGRESS was evaluated to be the best linear regression-based method in the challenge. We investigate in depth the influence of the various parameters of the method, and show that a fine parameter tuning can lead to significant improvements and state-of-the-art performance for GRN inference, in both directed and undirected settings.

Conclusions: TIGRESS reaches state-of-the-art performance on benchmark data, including both in silico and in vivo (E. coli and S. cerevisiae) networks. This study confirms the potential of feature selection techniques for GRN inference. Code and data are available on http://cbio.ensmp.fr/tigress. Moreover, TIGRESS can be run online through the GenePattern platform (GP-DREAM, http://dream.broadinstitute.org).

Citing Articles

Testing and overcoming the limitations of modular response analysis.

Borg J, Colinge J, Ravel P Brief Bioinform. 2025; 26(2).

PMID: 40062619 PMC: 11891662. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbaf098.

Modulatory Neurotransmitter Genotypes Shape Dynamic Functional Connectome Reconfigurations.

Jun S, Altmann A, Sadaghiani S J Neurosci. 2025; 45(10).

PMID: 39843237 PMC: 11884390. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1939-24.2025.

Time-series transcriptome analysis reveals the cascade mechanism of biological processes following the perturbation of the MVA pathway in Salvia miltiorrhiza.

Liu F, Li N, Yan Z, Chen X Plant Mol Biol. 2025; 115(1):20.

PMID: 39821838 PMC: 11742292. DOI: 10.1007/s11103-024-01547-5.

Diffusion-based generation of gene regulatory networks from scRNA-seq data with DigNet.

Wang C, Liu Z, Liu Z Genome Res. 2024; 35(2):340-354.

PMID: 39694856 PMC: 11874984. DOI: 10.1101/gr.279551.124.

Approaches for Benchmarking Single-Cell Gene Regulatory Network Methods.

Karamveer , Uzun Y Bioinform Biol Insights. 2024; 18:11779322241287120.

PMID: 39502448 PMC: 11536393. DOI: 10.1177/11779322241287120.

References

di Bernardo D, Thompson M, Gardner T, Chobot S, Eastwood E, Wojtovich A . Chemogenomic profiling on a genome-wide scale using reverse-engineered gene networks. Nat Biotechnol. 2005; 23(3):377-83. DOI: 10.1038/nbt1075. View

Bansal M, Della Gatta G, di Bernardo D . Inference of gene regulatory networks and compound mode of action from time course gene expression profiles. Bioinformatics. 2006; 22(7):815-22. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl003. View

Huynh-Thu V, Irrthum A, Wehenkel L, Geurts P . Inferring regulatory networks from expression data using tree-based methods. PLoS One. 2010; 5(9). PMC: 2946910. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012776. View

Yeung M, Tegner J, Collins J . Reverse engineering gene networks using singular value decomposition and robust regression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(9):6163-8. PMC: 122920. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.092576199. View

Marbach D, Costello J, Kuffner R, Vega N, Prill R, Camacho D . Wisdom of crowds for robust gene network inference. Nat Methods. 2012; 9(8):796-804. PMC: 3512113. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2016. View

Zoppoli P, Morganella S, Ceccarelli M . TimeDelay-ARACNE: Reverse engineering of gene networks from time-course data by an information theoretic approach. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010; 11:154. PMC: 2862045. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-154. View

Butte A, Tamayo P, Slonim D, Golub T, Kohane I . Discovering functional relationships between RNA expression and chemotherapeutic susceptibility using relevance networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97(22):12182-6. PMC: 17315. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.220392197. View

Tegner J, Yeung M, Hasty J, Collins J . Reverse engineering gene networks: integrating genetic perturbations with dynamical modeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(10):5944-9. PMC: 156306. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0933416100. View

Chen T, He H, Church G . Modeling gene expression with differential equations. Pac Symp Biocomput. 1999; :29-40. View

10.

Chen K, Wang T, Tseng H, Huang C, Kao C . A stochastic differential equation model for quantifying transcriptional regulatory network in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioinformatics. 2005; 21(12):2883-90. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti415. View

11.

Schaffter T, Marbach D, Floreano D . GeneNetWeaver: in silico benchmark generation and performance profiling of network inference methods. Bioinformatics. 2011; 27(16):2263-70. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr373. View

12.

Faith J, Driscoll M, Fusaro V, Cosgrove E, Hayete B, Juhn F . Many Microbe Microarrays Database: uniformly normalized Affymetrix compendia with structured experimental metadata. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007; 36(Database issue):D866-70. PMC: 2238822. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkm815. View

13.

Liang S, Fuhrman S, Somogyi R . Reveal, a general reverse engineering algorithm for inference of genetic network architectures. Pac Symp Biocomput. 1998; :18-29. View

14.

Marbach D, Prill R, Schaffter T, Mattiussi C, Floreano D, Stolovitzky G . Revealing strengths and weaknesses of methods for gene network inference. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(14):6286-91. PMC: 2851985. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0913357107. View

15.

Kuffner R, Petri T, Tavakkolkhah P, Windhager L, Zimmer R . Inferring gene regulatory networks by ANOVA. Bioinformatics. 2012; 28(10):1376-82. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts143. View

16.

Margolin A, Nemenman I, Basso K, Wiggins C, Stolovitzky G, Dalla Favera R . ARACNE: an algorithm for the reconstruction of gene regulatory networks in a mammalian cellular context. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006; 7 Suppl 1:S7. PMC: 1810318. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-S1-S7. View

17.

Friedman N, Linial M, Nachman I, Peer D . Using Bayesian networks to analyze expression data. J Comput Biol. 2000; 7(3-4):601-20. DOI: 10.1089/106652700750050961. View

18.

Gardner T, di Bernardo D, Lorenz D, Collins J . Inferring genetic networks and identifying compound mode of action via expression profiling. Science. 2003; 301(5629):102-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.1081900. View

19.

Mordelet F, Vert J . SIRENE: supervised inference of regulatory networks. Bioinformatics. 2008; 24(16):i76-82. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn273. View

20.

Hartemink A, Gifford D, Jaakkola T, Young R . Using graphical models and genomic expression data to statistically validate models of genetic regulatory networks. Pac Symp Biocomput. 2001; :422-33. DOI: 10.1142/9789814447362_0042. View