» Articles » PMID: 23149774

Ion Recombination Correction Factors (P(ion)) for Varian TrueBeam High-dose-rate Therapy Beams

Overview
Date 2012 Nov 15
PMID 23149774
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ion recombination is approximately corrected for in the Task Group 51 protocol by Pion, which is calculated by a two-voltage measurement. This measurement approach may be a poor estimate of the true recombination, particularly if Pion is large (greater than 1.05). Concern exists that Pion in high-dose-per-pulse beams, such as flattening filter free (FFF) beams, may be unacceptably high, rendering the two-voltage measurement technique inappropriate. Therefore, Pion was measured for flattened beams of 6, 10, 15, and 18 MV and for FFF beams of 6 and 10 MV. The values for the FFF beams were verified with 1/V versus 1/Q curves (Jaffé plots). Pion was also measured for electron beams of 6, 12, 16, 18, and 20 MeV on a traditional accelerator, as well as on the high-dose-rate Varian TrueBeam accelerator. The measurements were made at a range of depths and with PTW, NEL, and Exradin Farmer-type chambers. Consistent with the increased dose per pulse, Pion was higher for FFF beams than for flattening filter beams. However, for all beams, measurement locations, and chambers examined, Pion never exceeded 1.018. Additionally, Pion was always within 0.3% of the recombination calculated from the Jaffé plots. We conclude that ion recombination can be adequately accounted for in high-dose-rate FFF beams using Pion determined with the standard two-voltage technique.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of ion recombination and polarity effect on photon depth dose measurements using mini- and micro-ion chamber.

Fogliata A, Bresolin A, Gallo P, La Fauci F, Pelizzoli M, Reggiori G J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024; 26(1):e14495.

PMID: 39487690 PMC: 11712343. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14495.


Optimum delineation of skin structure for dose calculation with the linear Boltzmann transport equation algorithm in radiotherapy treatment planning.

Hamada K, Fujibuchi T, Arakawa H Radiol Phys Technol. 2024; 17(4):938-946.

PMID: 39249637 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-024-00840-8.


Evaluation of Ion Recombination Correction for Indigenously Developed Farmer Ion Chamber in Flattening Filter-Free Photon Beams.

Patwe P, Deshpande S, Mahajan G J Med Phys. 2024; 49(2):279-284.

PMID: 39131423 PMC: 11309131. DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_136_23.


Quantification of the role of lead foil in flattening filter free beam reference dosimetry.

Gao S, Nelson C, Wang C, Kathriarachchi V, Choi M, Saxena R J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023; 24(4):e13960.

PMID: 36913192 PMC: 10113695. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13960.


Characterization of the Plastic Scintillator Detector System Exradin W2 in a High Dose Rate Flattening-Filter-Free Photon Beam.

Thrower S, Prajapati S, Holmes S, Schuler E, Beddar S Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(18).

PMID: 36146135 PMC: 9505273. DOI: 10.3390/s22186785.


References
1.
Boag J . The recombination correction for an ionisation chamber exposed to pulsed radiation in a 'swept beam' technique. I. Theory. Phys Med Biol. 1982; 27(2):201-11. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/27/2/001. View

2.
Laitano R, Guerra A, Pimpinella M, Caporali C, Petrucci A . Charge collection efficiency in ionization chambers exposed to electron beams with high dose per pulse. Phys Med Biol. 2006; 51(24):6419-36. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/24/009. View

3.
McEwen M . Measurement of ionization chamber absorbed dose k(Q) factors in megavoltage photon beams. Med Phys. 2010; 37(5):2179-93. DOI: 10.1118/1.3375895. View

4.
Piermattei A, Canne S, Azario L, Russo A, Fidanzio A, Micelit R . The saturation loss for plane parallel ionization chambers at high dose per pulse values. Phys Med Biol. 2000; 45(7):1869-83. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/7/312. View

5.
Almond P, Biggs P, Coursey B, Hanson W, Huq M, Nath R . AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Med Phys. 1999; 26(9):1847-70. DOI: 10.1118/1.598691. View