» Articles » PMID: 23146657

Comparison of Mastoscopic and Conventional Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Breast Cancer: Long-term Results from a Randomized, Multicenter Trial

Overview
Journal Mayo Clin Proc
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2012 Nov 14
PMID 23146657
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare the long-term results of mastoscopic axillary lymph node dissection (MALND) and conventional axillary lymph node dissection (CALND).

Patients And Methods: From January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2005, a group of 1027 consecutive patients with operable breast cancer were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 study groups: MALND and CALND. The median follow-up was 63 months. The primary end points of the study were operative outcomes, complication reduction, function conservation, and cosmetics. The secondary end points were disease-free and overall survival.

Results: The mean operative blood loss in the MALND group was less than in the CALND group (P<.001). The patients who underwent MALND had less axillary pain, numbness or paresthesias, and arm swelling (P<.001). The aesthetic appearance of the axilla in the MALND group was much better than that in the CALND group (P=.001 at 6 months and P=.002 at 24 months). A significant difference was found between the 2 groups in distant metastasis (P=.04). The disease-free survival rate was 64.5% in the MALND group and 60.8% in the CALND group (P=.88). The overall survival rate was 81.7% in the MALND group and 78.6% in the CALND group (P=.95).

Conclusion: Compared with CALND, MALND has advantages in operative outcomes, complication reduction, function conservation, and cosmetics.

Citing Articles

Comparing the therapeutic efficacy of endoscopic minimally invasive surgery and traditional surgery for early-stage breast cancer: A meta-analysis.

Ma Q, Shi T, Wang H, Xing J Open Med (Wars). 2025; 20(1):20241133.

PMID: 39844785 PMC: 11751671. DOI: 10.1515/med-2024-1133.


Single-port non-lipolytic endoscopic surgery via the axillary approach for the treatment of benign breast tumors has better clinical outcomes: a case control study.

Ma T, Cui J, Wang Q, Liu C, Wang B, Wang H BMC Womens Health. 2025; 25(1):26.

PMID: 39825383 PMC: 11740456. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-025-03563-z.


Single-Port Three-Dimensional Endoscopic-Assisted Axillary Lymph Node Dissection (S-P 3D E-ALND): Surgical Technique and Preliminary Results.

Sae-Lim C, Lai H, Chennavasin P, Huang H, Lin S, Huang R Breast J. 2025; 2024:6319218.

PMID: 39742375 PMC: 11634405. DOI: 10.1155/tbj/6319218.


Comparison of endoscopic breast-conserving surgery versus conventional breast-conserving surgery for the treatment of early-stage breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Li L, Liang Y, Li C, Huang M, Liang W, Qin T Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1419123.

PMID: 39165683 PMC: 11333215. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1419123.


Comparison of minimal access and open breast surgery: a propensity score-matched study on postoperative immune function in breast cancer.

Jiang Q, Liao J, Tan J, Hu H World J Surg Oncol. 2024; 22(1):183.

PMID: 39010087 PMC: 11251114. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03447-w.


References
1.
Kamprath S, Bechler J, Kuhne-Heid R, Krause N, Schneider A . Endoscopic axillary lymphadenectomy without prior liposuction. Development of a technique and initial experience. Surg Endosc. 1999; 13(12):1226-9. DOI: 10.1007/pl00009626. View

2.
Zoli W, Barzanti F, Dal Susino M, de Paola F, Tesei A, Ricotti L . Flow-cytometric determination of tumor cells in lymph nodes. Oncology. 2002; 62(2):128-35. DOI: 10.1159/000048258. View

3.
Schwartz G, Tannebaum J, Jernigan A, Palazzo J . Axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for carcinoma of the breast. Cancer. 2010; 116(5):1243-51. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24887. View

4.
Chengyu L, Jian Z, Xiaoxin J, Hua L, Qi Y, Chen G . Experience of a large series of mastoscopic axillary lymph node dissection. J Surg Oncol. 2008; 98(2):89-93. DOI: 10.1002/jso.21080. View

5.
Yamashita K, Shimizu K . Endoscopic video-assisted breast surgery: procedures and short-term results. J Nippon Med Sch. 2006; 73(4):193-202. DOI: 10.1272/jnms.73.193. View