» Articles » PMID: 23138872

Serum-free Freezing Media Support High Cell Quality and Excellent ELISPOT Assay Performance Across a Wide Variety of Different Assay Protocols

Abstract

Robust and sensitive ELISPOT protocols are commonly applied concomitant with the development of new immunotherapeutics. Despite the knowledge that individual serum batches differ in their composition and may change properties over time, serum is still commonly used in immunologic assays. Commercially available serum batches are expensive, limited in quantity and need to be pretested for suitability in immunologic assays, which is a laborious process. The aim of this study was to test whether serum-free freezing media can lead to high cell viability and favorable performance across multiple ELISPOT assay protocols. Thirty-one laboratories from ten countries participated in a proficiency panel organized by the Cancer Immunotherapy Immunoguiding Program to test the influence of different freezing media on cell quality and immunologic function. Each center received peripheral blood mononuclear cells which were frozen in three different media. The participants were asked to quantify antigen-specific CD8+ T-cell responses against model antigens using their locally established IFN-gamma ELISPOT protocols. Self-made and commercially available serum-free freezing media led to higher cell viability and similar cell recovery after thawing and resting compared to freezing media supplemented with human serum. Furthermore, the test performance as determined by (1) background spot production, (2) replicate variation, (3) frequency of detected antigen-specific spots and (4) response detection rate was similar for serum and serum-free conditions. We conclude that defined and accessible serum-free freezing media should be recommended for freezing cells stored for subsequent ELISPOT analysis.

Citing Articles

Technical pitfalls when collecting, cryopreserving, thawing, and stimulating human T-cells.

Browne D, Miller C, Doolan D Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1382192.

PMID: 38812513 PMC: 11133553. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1382192.


Optimization of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell Processing for Improved Clinical ELISpot Assay Performance.

Li X, He S, Thomas J, Wu B, Yang T, Swanson M AAPS J. 2023; 25(6):93.

PMID: 37770755 DOI: 10.1208/s12248-023-00861-y.


Monitoring cell-mediated immune responses in AAV gene therapy clinical trials using a validated IFN-γ ELISpot method.

Patton K, Harrison M, Long B, Lau K, Holcomb J, Owen R Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2021; 22:183-195.

PMID: 34485604 PMC: 8399379. DOI: 10.1016/j.omtm.2021.05.012.


Booster immunization with a fractional dose of Prevnar 13 affects cell-mediated immune response but not humoral immunity in CD-1 mice.

Catalioto R, Valenti C, Bellucci F, Cialdai C, Altamura M, Digilio L Heliyon. 2021; 7(6):e07314.

PMID: 34195422 PMC: 8239470. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07314.


Optimization of a Method to Detect Autoantigen-Specific T-Cell Responses in Type 1 Diabetes.

Musthaffa Y, Nel H, Ramnoruth N, Patel S, Hamilton-Williams E, Harris M Front Immunol. 2021; 11:587469.

PMID: 33424839 PMC: 7793893. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.587469.


References
1.
Janetzki S, Price L, Britten C, van der Burg S, Caterini J, Currier J . Performance of serum-supplemented and serum-free media in IFNgamma Elispot Assays for human T cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2009; 59(4):609-18. PMC: 2813531. DOI: 10.1007/s00262-009-0788-2. View

2.
Mander A, Gouttefangeas C, Ottensmeier C, Welters M, Low L, van der Burg S . Serum is not required for ex vivo IFN-gamma ELISPOT: a collaborative study of different protocols from the European CIMT Immunoguiding Program. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2010; 59(4):619-27. PMC: 2813523. DOI: 10.1007/s00262-009-0814-4. View

3.
Bedognetti D, Balwit J, Wang E, Disis M, Britten C, Delogu L . SITC/iSBTc Cancer Immunotherapy Biomarkers Resource Document: online resources and useful tools - a compass in the land of biomarker discovery. J Transl Med. 2011; 9:155. PMC: 3189883. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-9-155. View

4.
Smith S, Joosten S, Verscheure V, Pathan A, McShane H, Ottenhoff T . Identification of major factors influencing ELISpot-based monitoring of cellular responses to antigens from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS One. 2009; 4(11):e7972. PMC: 2776358. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007972. View

5.
Janetzki S, Panageas K, Ben-Porat L, Boyer J, Britten C, Clay T . Results and harmonization guidelines from two large-scale international Elispot proficiency panels conducted by the Cancer Vaccine Consortium (CVC/SVI). Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2007; 57(3):303-15. PMC: 2150634. DOI: 10.1007/s00262-007-0380-6. View