» Articles » PMID: 23133630

The Relationship Between the Severity of Coronary Artery Disease and Epicardial Adipose Tissue Depends on the Left Ventricular Function

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2012 Nov 8
PMID 23133630
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) is an active metabolic and endocrine organ. Previous studies focusing mainly on patients with preserved left ventricular function (LVF) could show a correlation between increased amounts of EAT and the extent and activity of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, to date, there are no data available about the relationship between EAT and the severity of CAD with respect to the whole spectrum of LVF impairment. Therefore, we evaluated this relationship in patients with CAD.

Methods: 250 patients with CAD and 50 healthy controls underwent CMR examination to assess EAT. The severity of CAD was defined using the angiographic Gensini score (GSS).

Results: The GSS ranged from 2-364. Linear regression analysis revealed a significant correlation between EAT and GSS (r = 0.177, p = 0.01). Patients with mild (GSS≤10) and moderate CAD (GSS>10-≤40) showed comparable EAT to healthy controls. However, in patients with severe CAD (GSS>40) EAT was significantly reduced (p<0.0001) compared to healthy controls. Interestingly, patients with the same GSS revealed different EAT depending on the left ventricular function (LVF). Patients with preserved LVF (LVF≥50%) showed more EAT mass compared to those with reduced LVF (LVF<50%) regardless of the GSS. In patients with preserved LVF and mild CAD, EAT was comparable to healthy controls (61.8±19.4 g vs. 62.9±14.4 g, p = 0.8). In patients with moderate CAD, EAT rose significantly to 83.1±24.9 g (p = 0.01) and started to decline to 66.4±23.6 g in patients with severe CAD (p = 0.03). Contrary, in CAD patients with reduced LVF, EAT was already significantly reduced in patients with mild CAD as compared to healthy controls (p = 0.001) and showed a stepwise decline with increasing CAD severity.

Conclusion: The relationship between EAT and the severity of CAD depends on LVF. These findings emphasize the multifactorial interaction between EAT and the severity of CAD.

Citing Articles

The Role of Epicardial Adipose Tissue in Acute Coronary Syndromes, Post-Infarct Remodeling and Cardiac Regeneration.

Krauz K, Kempinski M, Janczak P, Momot K, Zarebinski M, Poprawa I Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(7).

PMID: 38612394 PMC: 11011833. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25073583.


Association of epicardial adipose tissue with different stages of coronary artery disease: A cross-sectional UK Biobank cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging substudy.

van Meijeren A, Ties D, de Koning M, van Dijk R, van Blokland I, Lizana Veloz P Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2022; 40:101006.

PMID: 35372662 PMC: 8971641. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101006.


Epicardial adipose tissue in long-term hemodialysis patients: its association with vascular calcification and long-term development.

Barros X, Dirrichs T, Koos R, Reinartz S, Kaesler N, Kramann R J Nephrol. 2015; 29(2):241-250.

PMID: 26253562 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-015-0221-1.

References
1.
Thanassoulis G, Massaro J, Hoffmann U, Mahabadi A, Vasan R, ODonnell C . Prevalence, distribution, and risk factor correlates of high pericardial and intrathoracic fat depots in the Framingham heart study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010; 3(5):559-66. PMC: 3063852. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.110.956706. View

2.
Sacks H, Fain J . Human epicardial adipose tissue: a review. Am Heart J. 2007; 153(6):907-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.03.019. View

3.
Doesch C, Suselbeck T, Leweling H, Fluechter S, Haghi D, Schoenberg S . Bioimpedance analysis parameters and epicardial adipose tissue assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with heart failure. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010; 18(12):2326-32. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2010.65. View

4.
Ahima R, Flier J . Adipose tissue as an endocrine organ. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2000; 11(8):327-32. DOI: 10.1016/s1043-2760(00)00301-5. View

5.
Iacobellis G . Epicardial and pericardial fat: close, but very different. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009; 17(4):625. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2008.575. View