» Articles » PMID: 23132893

Use of Electronic Patient Records for Research: Views of Patients and Staff in General Practice

Overview
Journal Fam Pract
Specialty Public Health
Date 2012 Nov 8
PMID 23132893
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Electronic patient records offer unique opportunities to undertake population-based research. The Health Research Support Service (HRSS) pilot project sought to extract electronic records on a national basis from across health and social care and transfer them together with identifiers to a designated 'safe haven'.

Objective: To determine the feasibility and acceptability of the HRSS pilot in primary care.

Methods: Interviews and focus groups with patients and practice staff.

Results: There was general support from both patients and staff for the principle of the HRSS. The 'opt-out' basis for participation in the HRSS drew mixed responses from patients and staff, with an appreciation of the advantages in relation to participation by default, but concerns about the extent to which this constituted true consent. Concerns were expressed about confidentiality and the safety and security of the extracted data. The patient information pack was roundly criticized by both patients and staff. Trust in individual GPs, practices and the National Health Service (NHS) was a crucial factor in patients' decisions about participation.

Conclusions: Although patients and staff were generally supportive of the HRSS, they require clear information about the proposed use of medical records for research purposes. The question of 'opt out' versus 'opt in' remains controversial and further consideration will be needed if research using routine medical records is to achieve its full potential as a 'core' activity in the NHS.

Citing Articles

I don't mind my information going to the Moon, but I don't want any letters from Mars: a qualitative exploration of the challenges with secondary use of health data in Ireland.

Bedenik T, Cahir C, Bennett K Arch Public Health. 2025; 83(1):50.

PMID: 39994771 PMC: 11849380. DOI: 10.1186/s13690-025-01524-4.


Citizen Views on an Opt-Out Approach to National Electronic Health Records in Germany: A Small-Scale Qualitative Study.

Papadopoulos K, Struckmann V, von Wyl V, Gille F Int J Public Health. 2024; 69:1607288.

PMID: 39022444 PMC: 11251894. DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607288.


Building public trust and confidence in secondary use of health data for healthcare improvement and research: a qualitative study pre-protocol.

Bedenik T, Cahir C, Bennett K HRB Open Res. 2024; 6:47.

PMID: 38947251 PMC: 11214037. DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13711.2.


What is public trust in national electronic health record systems? A scoping review of qualitative research studies from 1995 to 2021.

Papadopoulos K, von Wyl V, Gille F Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241228024.

PMID: 38288130 PMC: 10823845. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241228024.


Ethical Views on Sharing Digital Data for Public Health Surveillance: Analysis of Survey Data Among Patients.

Garett R, Young S Front Big Data. 2022; 5:871236.

PMID: 35547191 PMC: 9082996. DOI: 10.3389/fdata.2022.871236.