» Articles » PMID: 23127795

Non-linguistic Learning and Aphasia: Evidence from a Paired Associate and Feedback-based Task

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Psychology
Date 2012 Nov 7
PMID 23127795
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Though aphasia is primarily characterized by impairments in the comprehension and/or expression of language, research has shown that patients with aphasia also show deficits in cognitive-linguistic domains such as attention, executive function, concept knowledge and memory. Research in aphasia suggests that cognitive impairments can impact the online construction of language, new verbal learning, and transactional success. In our research, we extend this hypothesis to suggest that general cognitive deficits influence progress with therapy. The aim of our study is to explore learning, a cognitive process that is integral to relearning language, yet underexplored in the field of aphasia rehabilitation. We examine non-linguistic category learning in patients with aphasia (n=19) and in healthy controls (n=12), comparing feedback and non-feedback based instruction. Participants complete two computer-based learning tasks that require them to categorize novel animals based on the percentage of features shared with one of two prototypes. As hypothesized, healthy controls showed successful category learning following both methods of instruction. In contrast, only 60% of our patient population demonstrated successful non-linguistic category learning. Patient performance was not predictable by standardized measures of cognitive ability. Results suggest that general learning is affected in aphasia and is a unique, important factor to consider in the field of aphasia rehabilitation.

Citing Articles

An electrophysiological and behavioral investigation of feedback-based learning in aphasia.

Nunn K, Arbel Y, Vallila-Rohter S Aphasiology. 2024; 38(7):1195-1221.

PMID: 39148558 PMC: 11323110. DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2023.2267780.


The effect of feedback timing on category learning and feedback processing in younger and older adults.

Nunn K, Creighton R, Tilton-Bolowsky V, Arbel Y, Vallila-Rohter S Front Aging Neurosci. 2024; 16:1404128.

PMID: 38887611 PMC: 11182045. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1404128.


Insights gained over 60 years on factors shaping post-stroke aphasia recovery: A commentary on Vignolo (1964).

Varkanitsa M, Kiran S Cortex. 2023; 170:90-100.

PMID: 38123405 PMC: 10962385. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.12.002.


Targeted neurorehabilitation strategies in post-stroke aphasia.

Shah-Basak P, Boukrina O, Li X, Jebahi F, Kielar A Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2023; 41(3-4):129-191.

PMID: 37980575 PMC: 10741339. DOI: 10.3233/RNN-231344.


How Much Attention Do We Pay to Attention Deficits in Poststroke Aphasia?.

Varkanitsa M, Godecke E, Kiran S Stroke. 2022; 54(1):55-66.

PMID: 36542078 PMC: 9927868. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.037936.


References
1.
Maguire E, Frith C . The brain network associated with acquiring semantic knowledge. Neuroimage. 2004; 22(1):171-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.036. View

2.
Jefferies E, Lambon Ralph M . Semantic impairment in stroke aphasia versus semantic dementia: a case-series comparison. Brain. 2006; 129(Pt 8):2132-47. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awl153. View

3.
Erickson R, Goldinger S, LaPointe L . Auditory vigilance in aphasic individuals: detecting nonlinguistic stimuli with full or divided attention. Brain Cogn. 1996; 30(2):244-53. DOI: 10.1006/brcg.1996.0016. View

4.
Zinn S, Bosworth H, Hoenig H, Swartzwelder H . Executive function deficits in acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 88(2):173-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.11.015. View

5.
Noonan K, Jefferies E, Corbett F, Lambon Ralph M . Elucidating the nature of deregulated semantic cognition in semantic aphasia: evidence for the roles of prefrontal and temporo-parietal cortices. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009; 22(7):1597-613. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21289. View