» Articles » PMID: 23114368

Distinct Roles of Dopamine and Subthalamic Nucleus in Learning and Probabilistic Decision Making

Overview
Journal Brain
Specialty Neurology
Date 2012 Nov 2
PMID 23114368
Citations 45
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Even simple behaviour requires us to make decisions based on combining multiple pieces of learned and new information. Making such decisions requires both learning the optimal response to each given stimulus as well as combining probabilistic information from multiple stimuli before selecting a response. Computational theories of decision making predict that learning individual stimulus-response associations and rapid combination of information from multiple stimuli are dependent on different components of basal ganglia circuitry. In particular, learning and retention of memory, required for optimal response choice, are significantly reliant on dopamine, whereas integrating information probabilistically is critically dependent upon functioning of the glutamatergic subthalamic nucleus (computing the 'normalization term' in Bayes' theorem). Here, we test these theories by investigating 22 patients with Parkinson's disease either treated with deep brain stimulation to the subthalamic nucleus and dopaminergic therapy or managed with dopaminergic therapy alone. We use computerized tasks that probe three cognitive functions-information acquisition (learning), memory over a delay and information integration when multiple pieces of sequentially presented information have to be combined. Patients performed the tasks ON or OFF deep brain stimulation and/or ON or OFF dopaminergic therapy. Consistent with the computational theories, we show that stopping dopaminergic therapy impairs memory for probabilistic information over a delay, whereas deep brain stimulation to the region of the subthalamic nucleus disrupts decision making when multiple pieces of acquired information must be combined. Furthermore, we found that when participants needed to update their decision on the basis of the last piece of information presented in the decision-making task, patients with deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus region did not slow down appropriately to revise their plan, a pattern of behaviour that mirrors the impulsivity described clinically in some patients with subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation. Thus, we demonstrate distinct mechanisms for two important facets of human decision making: first, a role for dopamine in memory consolidation, and second, the critical importance of the subthalamic nucleus in successful decision making when multiple pieces of information must be combined.

Citing Articles

Monitoring Cognitive Functions During Deep Brain Stimulation Interventions by Real Time Neuropsychological Testing.

Guarracino I, Lettieri C, Mondani M, DAuria S, Sciacca G, Lavezzi F J Mov Disord. 2024; 17(4):442-446.

PMID: 39313238 PMC: 11540533. DOI: 10.14802/jmd.24102.


The subthalamic nucleus contributes causally to perceptual decision-making in monkeys.

Branam K, Gold J, Ding L Elife. 2024; 13.

PMID: 39311685 PMC: 11419670. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.98345.


Modeling impulsivity and risk aversion in the subthalamic nucleus with deep brain stimulation.

Voon V, Manssuer L, Zhao Y, Ding Q, Zhao Y, Wang L Nat Ment Health. 2024; 2(9):1084-1095.

PMID: 39263364 PMC: 11383798. DOI: 10.1038/s44220-024-00289-z.


Unraveling the enigmatic role of the subthalamic nucleus.

Yang Q Elife. 2024; 13.

PMID: 38984395 PMC: 11236414. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.100598.


Subthalamic control of impulsive actions: insights from deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease.

Herz D, Frank M, Tan H, Groppa S Brain. 2024; 147(11):3651-3664.

PMID: 38869168 PMC: 11531846. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awae184.


References
1.
Folstein M, Folstein S, McHugh P . "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975; 12(3):189-98. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. View

2.
Isoda M, Hikosaka O . Role for subthalamic nucleus neurons in switching from automatic to controlled eye movement. J Neurosci. 2008; 28(28):7209-18. PMC: 2667154. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0487-08.2008. View

3.
Knowlton B, Mangels J, Squire L . A neostriatal habit learning system in humans. Science. 1996; 273(5280):1399-402. DOI: 10.1126/science.273.5280.1399. View

4.
Sockeel P, Dujardin K, Devos D, Deneve C, Destee A, Defebvre L . The Lille apathy rating scale (LARS), a new instrument for detecting and quantifying apathy: validation in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006; 77(5):579-84. PMC: 2117430. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.075929. View

5.
Bethus I, Tse D, Morris R . Dopamine and memory: modulation of the persistence of memory for novel hippocampal NMDA receptor-dependent paired associates. J Neurosci. 2010; 30(5):1610-8. PMC: 6633999. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2721-09.2010. View