» Articles » PMID: 16700627

Interacting Adaptive Processes with Different Timescales Underlie Short-term Motor Learning

Overview
Journal PLoS Biol
Specialty Biology
Date 2006 May 17
PMID 16700627
Citations 554
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Multiple processes may contribute to motor skill acquisition, but it is thought that many of these processes require sleep or the passage of long periods of time ranging from several hours to many days or weeks. Here we demonstrate that within a timescale of minutes, two distinct fast-acting processes drive motor adaptation. One process responds weakly to error but retains information well, whereas the other responds strongly but has poor retention. This two-state learning system makes the surprising prediction of spontaneous recovery (or adaptation rebound) if error feedback is clamped at zero following an adaptation-extinction training episode. We used a novel paradigm to experimentally confirm this prediction in human motor learning of reaching, and we show that the interaction between the learning processes in this simple two-state system provides a unifying explanation for several different, apparently unrelated, phenomena in motor adaptation including savings, anterograde interference, spontaneous recovery, and rapid unlearning. Our results suggest that motor adaptation depends on at least two distinct neural systems that have different sensitivity to error and retain information at different rates.

Citing Articles

Cerebellar output shapes cortical preparatory activity during motor adaptation.

Israely S, Ninou H, Rajchert O, Elmaleh L, Harel R, Mawase F Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):2574.

PMID: 40089504 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-57832-4.


Cerebellar output shapes cortical preparatory activity during motor adaptation.

Israely S, Ninou H, Rajchert O, Elmaleh L, Harel R, Mawase F bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 40060411 PMC: 11888169. DOI: 10.1101/2024.07.12.603354.


Error prediction determines the coordinate system used for the representation of novel dynamics.

Leib R, Franklin D Elife. 2025; 14.

PMID: 40009064 PMC: 11864754. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.84349.


A neural implementation model of feedback-based motor learning.

Feulner B, Perich M, Miller L, Clopath C, Gallego J Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):1805.

PMID: 39979257 PMC: 11842561. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54738-5.


Effect of Aging and Cortical Stroke on Motor Adaptation to Overground Gait-Slips: Quantifying Differences in Adaptation Rate and Adaptation Plateau.

Purohit R, Wang S, Bhatt T Biomechanics (Basel). 2025; 3(1):29-44.

PMID: 39802458 PMC: 11722462. DOI: 10.3390/biomechanics3010003.


References
1.
Baddeley R, Ingram H, Miall R . System identification applied to a visuomotor task: near-optimal human performance in a noisy changing task. J Neurosci. 2003; 23(7):3066-75. PMC: 6742112. View

2.
Martin T, Keating J, Goodkin H, Bastian A, Thach W . Throwing while looking through prisms. I. Focal olivocerebellar lesions impair adaptation. Brain. 1996; 119 ( Pt 4):1183-98. DOI: 10.1093/brain/119.4.1183. View

3.
Lewis R, Zee D . Ocular motor disorders associated with cerebellar lesions: pathophysiology and topical localization. Rev Neurol (Paris). 1993; 149(11):665-77. View

4.
Lebron K, Milad M, Quirk G . Delayed recall of fear extinction in rats with lesions of ventral medial prefrontal cortex. Learn Mem. 2004; 11(5):544-8. DOI: 10.1101/lm.78604. View

5.
Fusi S, Drew P, Abbott L . Cascade models of synaptically stored memories. Neuron. 2005; 45(4):599-611. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.02.001. View