» Articles » PMID: 23112479

Flexural Strength of a Composite Resin Light Cured with Different Exposure Modes and Immersed in Ethanol or Distilled Water Media

Overview
Journal J Conserv Dent
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2012 Nov 1
PMID 23112479
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the flexural strength of a composite resin polymerized with three different modes of light exposure.

Materials And Methods: The three different modes of light exposure were conventional, 600 mW/cm2/40s; soft start, 300 mW/cm2/10s + 600 mW/cm2/30s; pulse delay, 600 mW/cm2/1s + 60 s of waiting time + 600 mW/cm2/39s). Twenty samples were prepared for each polymerization method. Flexural strength (FS) tests were carried out with a 2 kN load at a speed of 0.5 mm/ min. All tested groups were submitted to analysis of variance (one-way-ANOVA) and Tukey's test (P < 0.05).

Results: When stored in water, conventional and pulse delay groups presented higher FS values which were statistically different from the soft start group. When stored in 100% ethanol, conventional and soft start groups presented higher FS values which were statistically different from the pulse delay group.

Conclusion: Different polymerization modes and immersion media can affect the physical properties (flexural strength) of composite resin.

Citing Articles

The Effects of Intensity, Exposure Time, and Distance of Polymerization Light on Vickers Microhardness and Temperature Rise of Conventional Resin-Based Composite.

Duratbegovic D, Pervan N, Jakupovic S, Kobaslija S Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(22).

PMID: 39599266 PMC: 11598169. DOI: 10.3390/polym16223175.


How the Duration and Mode of Photopolymerization Affect the Mechanical Properties of a Dental Composite Resin.

Szalewski L, Wojcik D, Sofinska-Chmiel W, Kusmierz M, Rozylo-Kalinowska I Materials (Basel). 2023; 16(1).

PMID: 36614452 PMC: 9820875. DOI: 10.3390/ma16010113.


Effect of radiant exposure and UV accelerated aging on physico-chemical and mechanical properties of composite resins.

Cuevas-Suarez C, Meereis C, DAccorso N, Macchi R, Ancona-Meza A, Zamarripa-Calderon E J Appl Oral Sci. 2019; 27:e20180075.

PMID: 30624462 PMC: 6322643. DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0075.


Impact of dietary solvents on flexural properties of bulk-fill composites.

Eweis A, Yap A, Yahya N Saudi Dent J. 2018; 30(3):232-239.

PMID: 29942108 PMC: 6011214. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2018.04.002.


Influence of different crosshead speeds on diametral tensile strength of a methacrylate based resin composite: An in-vitro study.

Sood A, Ramarao S, Carounanidy U J Conserv Dent. 2015; 18(3):214-7.

PMID: 26069407 PMC: 4450527. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.157253.

References
1.
Friedl K, Schmalz G, Hiller K, Markl A . Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization". Oper Dent. 2001; 25(1):26-32. View

2.
Reza F, Lim S . Effects of curing mode of resin cements on the bond strength of a titanium post: An intraradicular study. J Conserv Dent. 2012; 15(2):123-6. PMC: 3339004. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.94576. View

3.
Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B . Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater. 2005; 21(9):864-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.003. View

4.
Calheiros F, Kawano Y, Stansbury J, Braga R . Influence of radiant exposure on contraction stress, degree of conversion and mechanical properties of resin composites. Dent Mater. 2006; 22(9):799-803. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.008. View

5.
Yap A, Teoh S . Comparison of flexural properties of composite restoratives using the ISO and mini-flexural tests. J Oral Rehabil. 2003; 30(2):171-7. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01004.x. View