» Articles » PMID: 23085815

Prevalence of Complications in Neuromuscular Scoliosis Surgery: a Literature Meta-analysis from the Past 15 Years

Overview
Journal Eur Spine J
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2012 Oct 23
PMID 23085815
Citations 60
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Our objectives were primarily to review the published literature on complications in neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS) surgery and secondarily, by means of a meta-analysis, to determine the overall pooled rates (PR) of various complications associated with NMS surgery.

Methods: PubMed and Embase databases were searched for studies reporting the outcomes and complications of NMS surgery, published from 1997 to May 2011. We focused on NMS as defined by the Scoliosis Research Society's classification. We measured the pooled estimate of the overall complication rates (PR) using a random effects meta-analytic model. This model considers both intra- and inter-study variation in calculating PR.

Results: Systematic review and meta-analysis were performed for 68 cohort and case-control studies with a total of 15,218 NMS patients. Pulmonary complications were the most reported (PR = 22.71 %) followed by implant complications (PR = 12.51 %), infections (PR = 10.91 %), neurological complications (PR = 3.01 %) and pseudoarthrosis (PR = 1.88 %). Revision, removal and extension of implant had highest PR (7.87 %) followed by malplacement of the pedicle screws (4.81 %). Rates of individual studies have moderate to high variability. The studies were heterogeneous in methodology and outcome types, which are plausible explanations for the variability; sensitivity analysis with respect to age at surgery, sample size, publication year and diagnosis could also partly explain this variability. In regard to surgical complications affiliated with various surgical techniques in NMS, the level of evidence of published literature ranges between 2+ to 2-; the subsequent recommendations are level C.

Conclusion: NMS patients have diverse and high complication rates after scoliosis surgery. High PRs of complications warrant more attention from the surgical community. Although the PR of all complications are affected by heterogeneity, they nevertheless provide valuable insights into the impact of methodological settings (sample size), patient characteristics (age at surgery), and continual advances in patient care on complication rates.

Citing Articles

A New Complication of Spinal Fusion Surgery for Neuromuscular Scoliosis-Posterior Mediastinal Hematoma: Case Report.

Allam A, Flores A, Hanson D, Bauer D Neurosurg Pract. 2025; 4(2):e00034.

PMID: 39958372 PMC: 11810013. DOI: 10.1227/neuprac.0000000000000034.


Elevated hospital floor-based HDU (POPUP-HDU): a new safe alternative to PICU for high-risk neuromuscular and syndromic children undergoing scoliosis surgery.

Bada E, Gouda J, Sewell M, Jones M, McKay G, Canchi-Murali N Spine Deform. 2024; 13(2):603-610.

PMID: 39463186 DOI: 10.1007/s43390-024-00992-y.


Comparison of two modeling approaches for the identification of predictors of complications in children with cerebral palsy following spine surgery.

Difazio R, Strout T, Vessey J, Berry J, Whitney D BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024; 24(1):236.

PMID: 39394575 PMC: 11468503. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-024-02360-w.


"Ultralow-dose" CT Without Sedation in Pediatric Patients With Neuromuscular Scoliosis.

Yee N, Iorio C, Shkumat N, Rocos B, Lebel D, Camp M J Pediatr Orthop. 2024; 45(1):e43-e48.

PMID: 39169901 PMC: 11627314. DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002786.


Effectiveness and safety of preoperative distraction using modified halo-pelvic Ilizarov distraction assembly in patients with severe kyphoscoliosis.

Ilyas M, Shah A, Zehra U, Ismail M, Elahi H, Aziz A Asian Spine J. 2024; 18(4):522-531.

PMID: 39117355 PMC: 11366560. DOI: 10.31616/asj.2024.0104.


References
1.
Smith J, Shaffrey C, Sansur C, Berven S, Fu K, Broadstone P . Rates of infection after spine surgery based on 108,419 procedures: a report from the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 36(7):556-63. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181eadd41. View

2.
Piazzolla A, Solarino G, De Giorgi S, Mori C, Moretti L, De Giorgi G . Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in neuromuscular scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2011; 20 Suppl 1:S75-84. PMC: 3087033. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1758-x. View

3.
Anello C, Fleiss J . Exploratory or analytic meta-analysis: should we distinguish between them?. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995; 48(1):109-16; discussion 117-8. DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)00084-4. View

4.
Larsson E, Aaro S, Normelli H, Oberg B . Long-term follow-up of functioning after spinal surgery in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(19):2145-52. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000180403.11757.6a. View

5.
Jones K, Sponseller P, Shindle M, McCarthy M . Longitudinal parental perceptions of spinal fusion for neuromuscular spine deformity in patients with totally involved cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2003; 23(2):143-9. View