» Articles » PMID: 23085724

Pregnancy in Renal Transplant Recipients: a UK National Cohort Study

Overview
Specialty Nephrology
Date 2012 Oct 23
PMID 23085724
Citations 53
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objectives: Most reports of pregnancy outcome in women with kidney transplants are single-center, retrospective, and include small numbers and few are compared with controls. The aim of this study was to collect information about pregnancy outcomes among all kidney transplant recipients in the United Kingdom, managed with current antenatal and nephrologic care, and to compare these data with a contemporaneous control group.

Design, Setting, Participants, & Measurements: Pregnant women with a kidney transplant were identified through the UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS) between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2009. Data on a comparison cohort were obtained from the UKOSS database, containing information on comparison women identified in previous studies. Outcomes were also compared with national data.

Results: There were 105 pregnancies identified in 101 recipients. Median prepregnancy creatinine was 118 μmol/L. Preeclampsia developed in 24% compared with 4% of the comparison group. Median gestation at delivery was 36 weeks, with 52% of women delivering at <37 weeks, significantly higher than the national rate of 8%. Twenty-four infants (24%) were small for gestational age (<10th centile). There were two (2%) cases of acute rejection. Potential predictive factors for poor pregnancy outcome included >1 previous kidney transplant (P=0.03), first trimester serum creatinine >125 μmol/L (P=0.001), and diastolic BP >90 mmHg in the second (P=0.002) and third trimesters (P=0.05).

Conclusions: Most pregnancies in the United Kingdom in women with kidney transplants are successful but rates of maternal and neonatal complications remain high.

Citing Articles

Maternal and infant outcomes of pregnancy after kidney transplantation: a retrospective cohort study.

Zhang Y, Zhang L, Xia W, Fang L, Zhu T Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025; .

PMID: 39907749 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-025-07947-2.


Kidney disease and reproductive health.

Smith P, Sarris I, Clark K, Wiles K, Bramham K Nat Rev Nephrol. 2024; 21(2):127-143.

PMID: 39501029 DOI: 10.1038/s41581-024-00901-6.


Family planning after transplantation: sex- and organ-related differences in the perception of medical counseling and social challenges.

Schirm N, Bohm L, Zimmermann T, Meyer N, von Versen-Hoynck F Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024; 311(2):275-322.

PMID: 39470769 PMC: 11890408. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07703-y.


Pregnancy outcomes in renal transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mustafa M, Noorani A, Abdul Rasool A, Tashrifwala F, Jayaram S, Raja S Womens Health (Lond). 2024; 20:17455057241277520.

PMID: 39287599 PMC: 11418342. DOI: 10.1177/17455057241277520.


Maternal and neonatal outcomes in kidney transplant recipients: a single-center observational study.

Artan A, Mirioglu S, Unal E, Suleymanova V, Oto O, Ozturk S Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2024; 137(3-4):89-97.

PMID: 39231814 DOI: 10.1007/s00508-024-02425-2.


References
1.
Davison J, Bailey D . Pregnancy following renal transplantation. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2003; 29(4):227-33. DOI: 10.1046/j.1341-8076.2003.00106.x. View

2.
Rizzoni G, Ehrich J, Broyer M, Brunner F, Brynger H, Fassbinder W . Successful pregnancies in women on renal replacement therapy: report from the EDTA Registry. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1992; 7(4):279-87. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.ndt.a092129. View

3.
Knight M . Peripartum hysterectomy in the UK: management and outcomes of the associated haemorrhage. BJOG. 2007; 114(11):1380-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01507.x. View

4.
Freeman J, Cole T, Chinn S, Jones P, White E, Preece M . Cross sectional stature and weight reference curves for the UK, 1990. Arch Dis Child. 1995; 73(1):17-24. PMC: 1511167. DOI: 10.1136/adc.73.1.17. View

5.
Stratta P, Canavese C, Giacchino F, Mesiano P, Quaglia M, Rossetti M . Pregnancy in kidney transplantation: satisfactory outcomes and harsh realities. J Nephrol. 2004; 16(6):792-806. View