» Articles » PMID: 23076447

Vitamin C and Zinc Intakes Are Related to Bone Macroarchitectural Structure and Strength in Prepubescent Girls

Overview
Specialty Pathology
Date 2012 Oct 19
PMID 23076447
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The extent to which nutrient intake may influence bone structure and strength during maximal rates of skeletal growth remains uncertain. We examined the relationship of dietary intake of micronutrients and bone macroarchitectural structure in young girls. This cross-sectional analysis included baseline data from 363 fourth- and sixth-grade girls enrolled in the Jump-In study. Nutrient intake was assessed using the Harvard Youth/Adolescent Food Frequency Questionnaire. Volumetric BMD (vBMD), bone geometry, and strength were measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Correlations and regression modeling assessed relations between usual nutrient intake and bone parameters. In fourth-grade girls, metaphyseal and diaphyseal area and circumferences as well as diaphyseal strength were associated with vitamin C intake (r = 0.15-0.19, p < 0.05). Zinc intake was correlated with diaphyseal vBMD (r = 0.15-0.16, p < 0.05). Using multiple linear regression to adjust for important covariates, we observed significant independent associations for vitamin C and zinc with bone parameters. For every milligram per day of vitamin C intake trabecular area increased by 11 %, cortical strength improved by 14 %, and periosteal and endosteal circumferences increased by 5 and 8.6 %, respectively. For every milligram per day of zinc intake, cortical vBMD increased by <1 %. No significant associations were observed in sixth-grade girls. Results of this study suggests that vitamin C and zinc intake are positively associated with objective measures of bone geometry, size, and strength in fourth-grade girls. This indicates that potential differences in micronutrient and bone associations at various age-associated stages of bone maturation may be indicative of competing hormonal influences.

Citing Articles

The Role of SUMO1 Modification of SOX9 in Cartilage Development Stimulated by Zinc Ions in Mice.

Xue N, Zhao J, Yin J, Liu L, Yang Z, Zhai S Organogenesis. 2025; 21(1):2460269.

PMID: 39905673 PMC: 11801356. DOI: 10.1080/15476278.2025.2460269.


Formula Milk Supplementation and Bone Acquisition in 4-6 Years Chinese Children: A 12-Month Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.

Li B, Mahe J, Hao J, Ye W, Bai X, Feng H Nutrients. 2023; 15(8).

PMID: 37111231 PMC: 10143222. DOI: 10.3390/nu15082012.


Biological basis of bone strength: anatomy, physiology and measurement.

Hart N, Newton R, Tan J, Rantalainen T, Chivers P, Siafarikas A J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2020; 20(3):347-371.

PMID: 32877972 PMC: 7493450.


Zinc as a Therapeutic Agent in Bone Regeneration.

OConnor J, Kanjilal D, Teitelbaum M, Lin S, Cottrell J Materials (Basel). 2020; 13(10).

PMID: 32408474 PMC: 7287917. DOI: 10.3390/ma13102211.


Anthropometry Versus Imaging for Prediction of Inflammation Among Hispanic Girls.

Bea J, Funk J, Hetherington-Rauth M, Wertheim B, Mosquiera L, Thuraisingam R Obesity (Silver Spring). 2018; 26(10):1594-1602.

PMID: 30277029 PMC: 6171347. DOI: 10.1002/oby.22265.


References
1.
Clarke B . Normal bone anatomy and physiology. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008; 3 Suppl 3:S131-9. PMC: 3152283. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.04151206. View

2.
Prynne C, Mishra G, OConnell M, Muniz G, Laskey M, Yan L . Fruit and vegetable intakes and bone mineral status: a cross sectional study in 5 age and sex cohorts. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006; 83(6):1420-8. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/83.6.1420. View

3.
Palacios C . The role of nutrients in bone health, from A to Z. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2006; 46(8):621-8. DOI: 10.1080/10408390500466174. View

4.
New S, Bolton-Smith C, Grubb D, Reid D . Nutritional influences on bone mineral density: a cross-sectional study in premenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997; 65(6):1831-9. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/65.6.1831. View

5.
Kuczmarski R, Ogden C, Guo S, Grummer-Strawn L, Flegal K, Mei Z . 2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States: methods and development. Vital Health Stat 11. 2002; (246):1-190. View